Using machine learning and big data for the prediction of venous thromboembolic events after spine surgery: A single-center retrospective analysis of multiple models on a cohort of 6869 patients.

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Benjamin S Hopkins, Michael B Cloney, Ekamjeet S Dhillon, Pavlos Texakalidis, Jonathan Dallas, Vincent N Nguyen, Matthew Ordon, Najib El Tecle, Thomas C Chen, Patrick C Hsieh, John C Liu, Tyler R Koski, Nader S Dahdaleh
{"title":"Using machine learning and big data for the prediction of venous thromboembolic events after spine surgery: A single-center retrospective analysis of multiple models on a cohort of 6869 patients.","authors":"Benjamin S Hopkins,&nbsp;Michael B Cloney,&nbsp;Ekamjeet S Dhillon,&nbsp;Pavlos Texakalidis,&nbsp;Jonathan Dallas,&nbsp;Vincent N Nguyen,&nbsp;Matthew Ordon,&nbsp;Najib El Tecle,&nbsp;Thomas C Chen,&nbsp;Patrick C Hsieh,&nbsp;John C Liu,&nbsp;Tyler R Koski,&nbsp;Nader S Dahdaleh","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_69_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Venous thromboembolic event (VTE) after spine surgery is a rare but potentially devastating complication. With the advent of machine learning, an opportunity exists for more accurate prediction of such events to aid in prevention and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven models were screened using 108 database variables and 62 preoperative variables. These models included deep neural network (DNN), DNN with synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE), logistic regression, ridge regression, lasso regression, simple linear regression, and gradient boosting classifier. Relevant metrics were compared between each model. The top four models were selected based on area under the receiver operator curve; these models included DNN with SMOTE, linear regression, lasso regression, and ridge regression. Separate random sampling of each model was performed 1000 additional independent times using a randomly generated training/testing distribution. Variable weights and magnitudes were analyzed after sampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using all patient-related variables, DNN using SMOTE was the top-performing model in predicting postoperative VTE after spinal surgery (area under the curve [AUC] =0.904), followed by lasso regression (AUC = 0.894), ridge regression (AUC = 0.873), and linear regression (AUC = 0.864). When analyzing a subset of only preoperative variables, the top-performing models were lasso regression (AUC = 0.865) and DNN with SMOTE (AUC = 0.864), both of which outperform any currently published models. Main model contributions relied heavily on variables associated with history of thromboembolic events, length of surgical/anesthetic time, and use of postoperative chemoprophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study provides promise toward machine learning methods geared toward predicting postoperative complications after spine surgery. Further study is needed in order to best quantify and model real-world risk for such events.</p>","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/53/JCVJS-14-221.PMC10583792.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_69_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Venous thromboembolic event (VTE) after spine surgery is a rare but potentially devastating complication. With the advent of machine learning, an opportunity exists for more accurate prediction of such events to aid in prevention and treatment.

Methods: Seven models were screened using 108 database variables and 62 preoperative variables. These models included deep neural network (DNN), DNN with synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE), logistic regression, ridge regression, lasso regression, simple linear regression, and gradient boosting classifier. Relevant metrics were compared between each model. The top four models were selected based on area under the receiver operator curve; these models included DNN with SMOTE, linear regression, lasso regression, and ridge regression. Separate random sampling of each model was performed 1000 additional independent times using a randomly generated training/testing distribution. Variable weights and magnitudes were analyzed after sampling.

Results: Using all patient-related variables, DNN using SMOTE was the top-performing model in predicting postoperative VTE after spinal surgery (area under the curve [AUC] =0.904), followed by lasso regression (AUC = 0.894), ridge regression (AUC = 0.873), and linear regression (AUC = 0.864). When analyzing a subset of only preoperative variables, the top-performing models were lasso regression (AUC = 0.865) and DNN with SMOTE (AUC = 0.864), both of which outperform any currently published models. Main model contributions relied heavily on variables associated with history of thromboembolic events, length of surgical/anesthetic time, and use of postoperative chemoprophylaxis.

Conclusions: The current study provides promise toward machine learning methods geared toward predicting postoperative complications after spine surgery. Further study is needed in order to best quantify and model real-world risk for such events.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用机器学习和大数据预测脊柱手术后静脉血栓栓塞事件:对6869名患者队列的多个模型的单中心回顾性分析。
目的:脊柱手术后静脉血栓栓塞事件(VTE)是一种罕见但具有潜在破坏性的并发症。随着机器学习的出现,有机会对此类事件进行更准确的预测,以帮助预防和治疗。方法:使用108个数据库变量和62个术前变量筛选7个模型。这些模型包括深度神经网络(DNN)、具有合成少数过采样技术的DNN(SMOTE)、逻辑回归、岭回归、套索回归、简单线性回归和梯度增强分类器。比较了每个模型之间的相关指标。根据受试者-操作员曲线下的面积选择前四个模型;这些模型包括带SMOTE的DNN、线性回归、lasso回归和岭回归。使用随机生成的训练/测试分布,对每个模型进行1000次额外的独立随机采样。采样后对可变权重和幅度进行分析。结果:使用所有患者相关变量,使用SMOTE的DNN是预测脊柱手术后VTE的最佳模型(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.904),其次是lasso回归(AUC=0.894)、山脊回归(AUC=0.873)和线性回归(AUC=0.864),表现最好的模型是lasso回归(AUC=0.865)和DNN与SMOTE(AUC=0.0864),这两个模型都优于目前发表的任何模型。主要模型贡献在很大程度上依赖于与血栓栓塞事件史、手术/麻醉时间长度和术后化学预防使用相关的变量。结论:目前的研究为预测脊柱手术后并发症的机器学习方法提供了前景。为了最好地量化和模拟此类事件的真实世界风险,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信