Long-term functional and radiological outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty at a tertiary level spine center in India: A retrospective cohort analysis with minimum 2 years of follow-up.

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Bharat Dave, Vikrant Chauhan, Prarthan Amin, Shivanand Mayi, Ajay Krishnan, Devanand Degulmadi, Ravi Ranjan Rai, Mirant Dave, Shiv Kumar Bali, Pranav Charde, Abhijith Anil
{"title":"Long-term functional and radiological outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty at a tertiary level spine center in India: A retrospective cohort analysis with minimum 2 years of follow-up.","authors":"Bharat Dave,&nbsp;Vikrant Chauhan,&nbsp;Prarthan Amin,&nbsp;Shivanand Mayi,&nbsp;Ajay Krishnan,&nbsp;Devanand Degulmadi,&nbsp;Ravi Ranjan Rai,&nbsp;Mirant Dave,&nbsp;Shiv Kumar Bali,&nbsp;Pranav Charde,&nbsp;Abhijith Anil","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_56_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) was developed for the treatment of cervical disc disease with the potential advantages of preservation of physiological motion at a discal level, thereby potentially reducing adjacent level stresses and degeneration, which were a known complication of anterior cervical arthrodesis. The objective of this study was the assessment of long-term functional and radiological outcomes overtime in all the patients who underwent CDA from 2011 to 2019 at our institute. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight patients who underwent CDA (2011–2019) with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. The functional outcome included the Visual Analog Score (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Radiographs were assessed for range of motion (ROM) at the index surgical level, presence of heterotopic ossification (HO), and adjacent segment degeneration. Results: The mean follow-up was 5.79 ± 2.96 (2.16–11.75) years. Significant improvement (P < 0.05) was observed in the VAS (8.91 ± 2.52 [preoperative] to 0.89 ± 1.27 [follow-up]) and NDI (65.5% ±23.06% [preoperative] to 4.79 ± 3.87 [follow-up]) score. Motion at index level increased significantly from 5.53° preoperatively to 7.47°, and 92% of the implanted segments were still mobile (referring to the threshold of ROM > 3°). HOs are responsible for the fusion of 4/50 (8%) levels at the last follow-up. Distal and proximal adjacent disc degeneration occurred in 36% and 28% of patients, respectively. No migration of the implant was observed on the radiograph. Conclusion: Our study showed favorable clinical outcome of CDA with preservation of ROM at the index surgical level. CDA can be a promising alternative to anterior cervical arthrodesis when properly indicated.","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7c/82/JCVJS-14-268.PMC10583798.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_56_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) was developed for the treatment of cervical disc disease with the potential advantages of preservation of physiological motion at a discal level, thereby potentially reducing adjacent level stresses and degeneration, which were a known complication of anterior cervical arthrodesis. The objective of this study was the assessment of long-term functional and radiological outcomes overtime in all the patients who underwent CDA from 2011 to 2019 at our institute. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight patients who underwent CDA (2011–2019) with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. The functional outcome included the Visual Analog Score (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Radiographs were assessed for range of motion (ROM) at the index surgical level, presence of heterotopic ossification (HO), and adjacent segment degeneration. Results: The mean follow-up was 5.79 ± 2.96 (2.16–11.75) years. Significant improvement (P < 0.05) was observed in the VAS (8.91 ± 2.52 [preoperative] to 0.89 ± 1.27 [follow-up]) and NDI (65.5% ±23.06% [preoperative] to 4.79 ± 3.87 [follow-up]) score. Motion at index level increased significantly from 5.53° preoperatively to 7.47°, and 92% of the implanted segments were still mobile (referring to the threshold of ROM > 3°). HOs are responsible for the fusion of 4/50 (8%) levels at the last follow-up. Distal and proximal adjacent disc degeneration occurred in 36% and 28% of patients, respectively. No migration of the implant was observed on the radiograph. Conclusion: Our study showed favorable clinical outcome of CDA with preservation of ROM at the index surgical level. CDA can be a promising alternative to anterior cervical arthrodesis when properly indicated.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

印度三级脊柱中心颈椎间盘置换术的长期功能和放射学结果:一项至少随访2年的回顾性队列分析。
背景:颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)是为治疗颈椎间盘疾病而开发的,其潜在优势是在椎间盘水平上保持生理运动,从而潜在地减少相邻水平的应力和退变,这是颈前路关节融合术的一种已知并发症。本研究的目的是评估2011年至2019年在我们研究所接受CDA的所有患者的长期功能和放射学结果。材料和方法:对48名接受CDA(2011-2019)并至少随访2年的患者进行回顾性评估。功能结果包括视觉模拟评分(VAS)和颈部残疾指数(NDI)。评估了指数手术水平下的运动范围(ROM)、异位骨化(HO)和邻近节段退变的X线片。结果:平均随访时间为5.79±2.96(2.16-11.75)年。VAS评分(8.91±2.52[术前]至0.89±1.27[随访])和NDI评分(65.5%±23.06%[术前]至4.79±3.87[随访]])均有显著改善(P<0.05)。指数水平的运动从术前的5.53°显著增加到7.47°,92%的植入节段仍然是可移动的(指ROM>3°的阈值)。HO负责最后一次随访时4/50(8%)水平的融合。远端和近端邻近椎间盘退变分别发生在36%和28%的患者中。射线照片上未观察到植入物的迁移。结论:我们的研究显示CDA在保留ROM的情况下具有良好的临床疗效。CDA是一种很有前途的替代颈前路关节融合术的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信