Does physical therapy impact clinical outcomes after lumbar decompression surgery?

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Jeremy C Heard, Nicholas D D'Antonio, Mark J Lambrechts, Payton Boere, Tariq Z Issa, Yunsoo A Lee, Jose A Canseco, Ian David Kaye, Barrett R Woods, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder
{"title":"Does physical therapy impact clinical outcomes after lumbar decompression surgery?","authors":"Jeremy C Heard,&nbsp;Nicholas D D'Antonio,&nbsp;Mark J Lambrechts,&nbsp;Payton Boere,&nbsp;Tariq Z Issa,&nbsp;Yunsoo A Lee,&nbsp;Jose A Canseco,&nbsp;Ian David Kaye,&nbsp;Barrett R Woods,&nbsp;Alan S Hilibrand,&nbsp;Alexander R Vaccaro,&nbsp;Christopher K Kepler,&nbsp;Gregory D Schroeder","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_61_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of our study were to (1) determine if physical therapy (PT) impacts patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after lumbar decompression surgery and (2) determine if PT impacts postsurgical readmissions or reoperations after lumbar decompression surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients <b>></b>18 years of age who underwent primary one- or two-level lumbar decompression at our institution were identified. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, surgical outcomes (all-cause 90 days readmissions and 90 days surgical readmissions), and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were compared between the groups. Multivariate linear regression was utilized to determine the individual predictors of 90 days readmissions and PROMs at the 1-year postoperative point. Alpha was set at <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1003 patients included, 421 attended PT postoperatively. On univariate analysis, PT attendance did not significantly impact 90-day surgical reoperations (<i>P</i> = 0.225). Although bivariate analysis suggests that attendance of PT is associated with worse improvement in physical function (<i>P</i> = 0.041), increased preoperative Visual Analogue Scale leg pain (0 = 0.004), and disability (<i>P</i> = 0.006), as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index, our multivariate analysis, which accounts for confounding variables found there was no difference in PROM improvement and PT was not an independent predictor of 90-day all-cause readmissions (<i>P</i> = 0.06). Instead, Charlson Comorbidity Index (<i>P</i> = 0.025) and discharge to a skilled nursing facility (<i>P</i> = 0.013) independently predicted greater 90-day all-cause readmissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postoperative lumbar decompression PT attendance does not significantly affect clinical improvement, as measured by PROMs or surgical outcomes including all-cause 90 days readmissions and 90-day surgical readmissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fd/8e/JCVJS-14-230.PMC10583794.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_61_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of our study were to (1) determine if physical therapy (PT) impacts patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after lumbar decompression surgery and (2) determine if PT impacts postsurgical readmissions or reoperations after lumbar decompression surgery.

Methods: Patients >18 years of age who underwent primary one- or two-level lumbar decompression at our institution were identified. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, surgical outcomes (all-cause 90 days readmissions and 90 days surgical readmissions), and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were compared between the groups. Multivariate linear regression was utilized to determine the individual predictors of 90 days readmissions and PROMs at the 1-year postoperative point. Alpha was set at P < 0.05.

Results: Of the 1003 patients included, 421 attended PT postoperatively. On univariate analysis, PT attendance did not significantly impact 90-day surgical reoperations (P = 0.225). Although bivariate analysis suggests that attendance of PT is associated with worse improvement in physical function (P = 0.041), increased preoperative Visual Analogue Scale leg pain (0 = 0.004), and disability (P = 0.006), as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index, our multivariate analysis, which accounts for confounding variables found there was no difference in PROM improvement and PT was not an independent predictor of 90-day all-cause readmissions (P = 0.06). Instead, Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = 0.025) and discharge to a skilled nursing facility (P = 0.013) independently predicted greater 90-day all-cause readmissions.

Conclusions: Postoperative lumbar decompression PT attendance does not significantly affect clinical improvement, as measured by PROMs or surgical outcomes including all-cause 90 days readmissions and 90-day surgical readmissions.

物理治疗是否影响腰椎减压手术后的临床结果?
目的:我们研究的目的是(1)确定物理治疗(PT)是否会影响腰椎减压手术后患者报告的结果(PROM),以及(2)确定物理疗法是否会影响腰部减压手术后的术后再次入院或再次手术。方法:对在我院接受一级或两级腰椎减压的18岁以上患者进行鉴定。比较两组患者的人口统计学、手术特征、手术结果(全因90天再入院和90天手术再入院)和患者报告结果(PROM)。多变量线性回归用于确定术后1年90天再入院和胎膜早破的个体预测因素。结果:在1003名患者中,421名患者在术后接受PT治疗。在单变量分析中,PT就诊对90天的手术再次手术没有显著影响(P=0.225)。尽管双变量分析表明,PT就诊与身体功能改善较差(P=0.041)、术前视觉模拟量表腿痛增加(0=0.004)和残疾(P=0.006)有关,如Oswestry残疾指数所衡量的,我们对混杂变量的多变量分析发现,胎膜早破的改善没有差异,PT不是90天全因再入院的独立预测因素(P=0.06)。相反,Charlson合并症指数(P=0.025)和出院到熟练护理机构(P=0.013)独立预测了更大的90天全原因再入院。结论:根据PROMs或手术结果(包括全因90天再入院和90天手术再入院)衡量,术后腰椎减压PT的出勤率不会显著影响临床改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信