Amirhossein Aghakhani, Milad Yousefi, Mir Saeed Yekaninejad
{"title":"Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Outcome: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Amirhossein Aghakhani, Milad Yousefi, Mir Saeed Yekaninejad","doi":"10.1177/00034894231206902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Machine Learning models have been applied in various healthcare fields, including Audiology, to predict disease outcomes. The prognosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss is difficult to predict due to the variable course of the disease. Hence, researchers have attempted to utilize ML models to predict the outcome of patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The objectives of this study were to review the performance of these machine learning models and assess their applicability in real-world settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. Only studies that built machine learning prediction models were included, and studies that used algorithms such as logistic regression only for the purpose of adjusting for confounding variables were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening, a total of 7 papers were eligible for synthesis. In total, these studies built 48 ML models. The most common utilized algorithms were Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and boosting. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged between 0.59 and 0.915. All of the included studies had a high risk of bias; hence there are concerns regarding their applicability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although these models showed great performance and promising results, future studies are still needed before these models can be applied in a real-world setting. Future studies should employ multiple cohorts, different feature selection methods, and external validation to further validate the models' applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":50975,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894231206902","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Machine Learning models have been applied in various healthcare fields, including Audiology, to predict disease outcomes. The prognosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss is difficult to predict due to the variable course of the disease. Hence, researchers have attempted to utilize ML models to predict the outcome of patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The objectives of this study were to review the performance of these machine learning models and assess their applicability in real-world settings.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. Only studies that built machine learning prediction models were included, and studies that used algorithms such as logistic regression only for the purpose of adjusting for confounding variables were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).
Results: After screening, a total of 7 papers were eligible for synthesis. In total, these studies built 48 ML models. The most common utilized algorithms were Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and boosting. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged between 0.59 and 0.915. All of the included studies had a high risk of bias; hence there are concerns regarding their applicability.
Conclusion: Although these models showed great performance and promising results, future studies are still needed before these models can be applied in a real-world setting. Future studies should employ multiple cohorts, different feature selection methods, and external validation to further validate the models' applicability.
背景:机器学习模型已应用于各种医疗保健领域,包括听力学,以预测疾病结果。突发性感音神经性听力损失的预后很难预测,因为疾病的病程各不相同。因此,研究人员试图利用ML模型来预测突发性感音神经性听力损失患者的预后。本研究的目的是审查这些机器学习模型的性能,并评估它们在现实世界中的适用性。方法:在PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus上进行系统检索。只包括建立机器学习预测模型的研究,排除了仅为调整混杂变量而使用逻辑回归等算法的研究。使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)评估偏倚风险。结果:经过筛选,共有7篇论文符合合成条件。这些研究总共建立了48个ML模型。最常用的算法是逻辑回归、支持向量机和boosting。接收器工作特性曲线的曲线下面积在0.59和0.915之间。所有纳入的研究都有很高的偏倚风险;因此存在对其适用性的担忧。结论:尽管这些模型表现出了良好的性能和有希望的结果,但在这些模型应用于现实世界之前,还需要进一步的研究。未来的研究应该采用多个队列、不同的特征选择方法和外部验证来进一步验证模型的适用性。
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology publishes original manuscripts of clinical and research importance in otolaryngology–head and neck medicine and surgery, otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, head and neck oncology and surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, pediatric otolaryngology, audiology, and speech pathology. In-depth studies (supplements), papers of historical interest, and reviews of computer software and applications in otolaryngology are also published, as well as imaging, pathology, and clinicopathology studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. AOR is the official journal of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association.