Revisiting the History of Odontoma, with Special Reference to Its Original Illustration.

IF 3.2 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Head & Neck Pathology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1007/s12105-023-01593-3
Fumio Ide, Shinnichi Sakamoto, Yuji Miyazaki, Michiko Nishimura, Takashi Muramatsu, Kentaro Kikuchi
{"title":"Revisiting the History of Odontoma, with Special Reference to Its Original Illustration.","authors":"Fumio Ide, Shinnichi Sakamoto, Yuji Miyazaki, Michiko Nishimura, Takashi Muramatsu, Kentaro Kikuchi","doi":"10.1007/s12105-023-01593-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Practically every facet of the most common odontogenic tumor, odontoma, has been covered by an extensive volume of literature. However, uncertainty about its precise history has persisted.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The historical evolution of odontoma was traced with reference to the original illustrations that accompanied European and American reports published at the beginning of the 19th century and also at the turn of the century.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevailing views regarding the first description of odontoma by Oudet of Paris in 1809 and the original designation \"odontome\" by Broca of Paris in 1867 are not entirely accurate. Before Broca's suggested term, \"exostose dentaire\" (dental exostosis) and \"tumeur dentaire\" (dental tumor) proposed by Oudet and Forget of Paris, respectively, were popular terms adopted in France, while in Briatin the terms \"warty tooth\" and \"supernumerary teeth\" proposed by Salter and Tomes of London, respectively, were widely coined. The original illustrations of complex odontoma were published by Wedl of Vienna in 1851, and in 1862 Tomes published the first drawing of compound odontoma denticles. Before the advent of diagnostic radiography in the early 1900s, spontaneous exposure or eruption of odontoma followed by secondary infection was very common. In 1887-1888, Bland Sutton of London criticized Broca's monumental research and formulated the first modern classification which, in essence, remains valid today. At that time, large osteomas of the maxilla were inappropriately classified as odontomas by many pathologists because of Bland Sutton's influential view. Interestingly, the first radiographic evidence of odontoma was published by the American oral surgeon Gilmer in 1899.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In view of their fundamental achievements, the names of Wedl, Salter, Broca and Bland Sutton have been closely associated with the true history of odontoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":47972,"journal":{"name":"Head & Neck Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10739675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Neck Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-023-01593-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Practically every facet of the most common odontogenic tumor, odontoma, has been covered by an extensive volume of literature. However, uncertainty about its precise history has persisted.

Materials and methods: The historical evolution of odontoma was traced with reference to the original illustrations that accompanied European and American reports published at the beginning of the 19th century and also at the turn of the century.

Results: The prevailing views regarding the first description of odontoma by Oudet of Paris in 1809 and the original designation "odontome" by Broca of Paris in 1867 are not entirely accurate. Before Broca's suggested term, "exostose dentaire" (dental exostosis) and "tumeur dentaire" (dental tumor) proposed by Oudet and Forget of Paris, respectively, were popular terms adopted in France, while in Briatin the terms "warty tooth" and "supernumerary teeth" proposed by Salter and Tomes of London, respectively, were widely coined. The original illustrations of complex odontoma were published by Wedl of Vienna in 1851, and in 1862 Tomes published the first drawing of compound odontoma denticles. Before the advent of diagnostic radiography in the early 1900s, spontaneous exposure or eruption of odontoma followed by secondary infection was very common. In 1887-1888, Bland Sutton of London criticized Broca's monumental research and formulated the first modern classification which, in essence, remains valid today. At that time, large osteomas of the maxilla were inappropriately classified as odontomas by many pathologists because of Bland Sutton's influential view. Interestingly, the first radiographic evidence of odontoma was published by the American oral surgeon Gilmer in 1899.

Conclusion: In view of their fundamental achievements, the names of Wedl, Salter, Broca and Bland Sutton have been closely associated with the true history of odontoma.

重温Odontoma的历史,并特别参考其原始插图。
背景:事实上,最常见的牙源性肿瘤牙瘤的每一个方面都被大量的文献报道。然而,关于其确切历史的不确定性一直存在。材料和方法:齿瘤的历史演变是参考19世纪初和本世纪之交发表的欧美报告中的原始插图来追溯的。结果:关于1809年巴黎的Oudet对牙瘤的首次描述和1867年巴黎的Broca对“牙痛”的最初命名,主流观点并不完全准确。在Broca提出的术语之前,Oudet和Forget of Paris分别提出的“牙齿外生”和“牙齿肿瘤”是法国采用的流行术语,而在Briatin,Salter和Tomes分别提出的术语“疣牙”和“多余牙齿”被广泛创造。1851年,维也纳的韦德尔出版了复杂齿瘤的原始插图,1862年,汤姆斯出版了第一幅复杂齿瘤小齿图。在20世纪初诊断性放射学出现之前,牙瘤的自发暴露或萌出以及继发感染是非常常见的。1887-1888年,伦敦的布兰德·萨顿批评了布罗卡的不朽研究,并制定了第一个现代分类法,从本质上讲,该分类法至今仍然有效。当时,由于布兰德·萨顿有影响力的观点,许多病理学家不恰当地将上颌骨的大骨瘤归类为牙瘤。有趣的是,1899年,美国口腔外科医生Gilmer发表了第一份牙瘤的放射学证据。结论:鉴于他们的基本成就,Wedl、Salter、Broca和Bland Sutton的名字与牙瘤的真实病史密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Head & Neck Pathology presents scholarly papers, reviews and symposia that cover the spectrum of human surgical pathology within the anatomic zones of the oral cavity, sinonasal tract, larynx, hypopharynx, salivary gland, ear and temporal bone, and neck. The journal publishes rapid developments in new diagnostic criteria, intraoperative consultation, immunohistochemical studies, molecular techniques, genetic analyses, diagnostic aids, experimental pathology, cytology, radiographic imaging, and application of uniform terminology to allow practitioners to continue to maintain and expand their knowledge in the subspecialty of head and neck pathology. Coverage of practical application to daily clinical practice is supported with proceedings and symposia from international societies and academies devoted to this field. Single-blind peer review The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信