Limitations of Trainings in Cross-Cultural Competence - The Practitioner Perspective.

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU Pub Date : 2023-09-01
Theresa Steinhäuser, Steffen Schödwell, Anna Auckenthaler
{"title":"Limitations of Trainings in Cross-Cultural Competence - The Practitioner Perspective.","authors":"Theresa Steinhäuser,&nbsp;Steffen Schödwell,&nbsp;Anna Auckenthaler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Objective: Trainings in cross-cultural competence1 are of increasing importance for psychotherapists in order to provide adequate mental health care for patients with a migration background. Yet, little is known about practitioners´ perspectives on working with migrants. Method: Problem-centered interviews with 30 practitioners offering psychotherapy within the German mental health care system have been analyzed using Grounded Theory Methodology to get an insight into practitioners´ experiences with cross-cultural work. Results: Practitioners have to deal with strong feelings of insecurity in their cross-cultural work. Feelings of insecurity were influenced by practitioners' underlying cultural concepts, how specific they perceived the cross-cultural contact to be and how they saw themselves in their professional role as psychotherapists. Interestingly, the analysis shows that trainings in cross-cultural competence which mainly convey \"culture specific\" knowledge on a rather theoretical level might even increase practitioners' feelings of insecurity. Conclusions: Conventional teaching formats in cross-cultural competence might not provide psychotherapists with sufficient space to reflect on their insecurities, their \"cultural concepts\", and their expectations of themselves in their professional role. Therefore, other settings are required. Dealing with practitioners' perceived lack of knowledge in the context of culture could be an effective starting point to deal with cross-cultural insecurities.</p>","PeriodicalId":44874,"journal":{"name":"THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU","volume":"80 7","pages":"333-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Objective: Trainings in cross-cultural competence1 are of increasing importance for psychotherapists in order to provide adequate mental health care for patients with a migration background. Yet, little is known about practitioners´ perspectives on working with migrants. Method: Problem-centered interviews with 30 practitioners offering psychotherapy within the German mental health care system have been analyzed using Grounded Theory Methodology to get an insight into practitioners´ experiences with cross-cultural work. Results: Practitioners have to deal with strong feelings of insecurity in their cross-cultural work. Feelings of insecurity were influenced by practitioners' underlying cultural concepts, how specific they perceived the cross-cultural contact to be and how they saw themselves in their professional role as psychotherapists. Interestingly, the analysis shows that trainings in cross-cultural competence which mainly convey "culture specific" knowledge on a rather theoretical level might even increase practitioners' feelings of insecurity. Conclusions: Conventional teaching formats in cross-cultural competence might not provide psychotherapists with sufficient space to reflect on their insecurities, their "cultural concepts", and their expectations of themselves in their professional role. Therefore, other settings are required. Dealing with practitioners' perceived lack of knowledge in the context of culture could be an effective starting point to deal with cross-cultural insecurities.

跨文化能力培训的局限性——从业者视角。
引言:目的:跨文化能力培训1对心理治疗师来说越来越重要,以便为有移民背景的患者提供足够的心理健康护理。然而,从业者对移民工作的看法却知之甚少。方法:采用扎根理论方法对德国精神卫生保健系统内30名提供心理治疗的从业者进行了以问题为中心的访谈,以深入了解从业者的跨文化工作经历。结果:从业者在跨文化工作中必须处理强烈的不安全感。不安全感受到从业者潜在文化概念的影响,他们对跨文化接触的具体看法,以及他们如何看待自己作为心理治疗师的职业角色。有趣的是,分析表明,跨文化能力培训主要在相当理论的层面上传达“特定文化”的知识,甚至可能增加从业者的不安全感。结论:跨文化能力的传统教学形式可能无法为心理治疗师提供足够的空间来反思他们的不安全感、“文化概念”以及他们在职业角色中对自己的期望。因此,需要其他设置。处理从业者在文化背景下感知到的知识缺乏,可能是处理跨文化不安全感的有效起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU
THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Monat für Monat ein aktuelles Thema der praktischen Medizin - als Sammlung ein hochaktuelles Nachschlagewerk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信