Purebred dogs show higher levels of genomic damage compared to mixed breed dogs.

IF 2.7 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Mammalian Genome Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-21 DOI:10.1007/s00335-023-10020-5
Alfredo Santovito, Martina Saracco, Manuel Scarfo', Alessandro Nota, Sandro Bertolino
{"title":"Purebred dogs show higher levels of genomic damage compared to mixed breed dogs.","authors":"Alfredo Santovito, Martina Saracco, Manuel Scarfo', Alessandro Nota, Sandro Bertolino","doi":"10.1007/s00335-023-10020-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inbreeding is a common phenomenon in small, fragmented or isolated populations, typical conditions of many threatened species. In the present paper, we used a new non-invasive approach based on the buccal micronucleus assay to evaluate the possible relationships between inbreeding and genomic damage using the dog as model species. In particular, we assessed the frequencies of micronuclei and other nuclear aberrations in a group of purebred dogs (n = 77), comparing the obtained data with those from a control group represented by mixed breed dogs (n = 75). We found a significant increase of micronuclei, nuclear buds and total nuclear aberrations frequencies in purebred dogs compared to mixed-bred dogs. The absence of significant differences in the frequency of micronuclei and other nuclear aberrations amongst different breeds reinforces the hypothesis that the observed increased genomic damage amongst purebred dogs may not be due to a different genomic instability typical of a particular breed, but to inbreeding itself. This hypothesis is further confirmed by the fact that other endogen confounding factors, such as sex, age and weight, do not contribute significantly to the increase of genomic damage observed amongst purebred dogs. In conclusion, results presented in this study showed that, in purebred dogs, inbreeding may increase the levels of genomic damage. Considering that genomic damage is associated with increased physiological problems affecting animal health, the results we obtained may represent a stimulus to discourage the use of intensive inbreeding practices in captive populations and to reduce the fragmentation of wild populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18259,"journal":{"name":"Mammalian Genome","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10884103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mammalian Genome","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-023-10020-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inbreeding is a common phenomenon in small, fragmented or isolated populations, typical conditions of many threatened species. In the present paper, we used a new non-invasive approach based on the buccal micronucleus assay to evaluate the possible relationships between inbreeding and genomic damage using the dog as model species. In particular, we assessed the frequencies of micronuclei and other nuclear aberrations in a group of purebred dogs (n = 77), comparing the obtained data with those from a control group represented by mixed breed dogs (n = 75). We found a significant increase of micronuclei, nuclear buds and total nuclear aberrations frequencies in purebred dogs compared to mixed-bred dogs. The absence of significant differences in the frequency of micronuclei and other nuclear aberrations amongst different breeds reinforces the hypothesis that the observed increased genomic damage amongst purebred dogs may not be due to a different genomic instability typical of a particular breed, but to inbreeding itself. This hypothesis is further confirmed by the fact that other endogen confounding factors, such as sex, age and weight, do not contribute significantly to the increase of genomic damage observed amongst purebred dogs. In conclusion, results presented in this study showed that, in purebred dogs, inbreeding may increase the levels of genomic damage. Considering that genomic damage is associated with increased physiological problems affecting animal health, the results we obtained may represent a stimulus to discourage the use of intensive inbreeding practices in captive populations and to reduce the fragmentation of wild populations.

Abstract Image

与杂交犬相比,纯种犬表现出更高水平的基因组损伤。
近交是小型、分散或孤立种群中的常见现象,这是许多濒危物种的典型情况。在本文中,我们使用了一种基于口腔微核试验的新的非侵入性方法,以狗为模型物种来评估近亲繁殖与基因组损伤之间的可能关系。特别是,我们评估了一组纯种狗(n = 77),将所获得的数据与以混合品种狗(n = 75)。我们发现,与杂交狗相比,纯种狗的微核、核芽和总核畸变频率显著增加。不同品种的微核和其他核畸变频率没有显著差异,这强化了一种假设,即在纯种狗中观察到的基因组损伤增加可能不是由于特定品种的不同基因组不稳定性,而是近亲繁殖本身。性别、年龄和体重等其他内生混杂因素对纯种狗基因组损伤的增加没有显著影响,这一事实进一步证实了这一假设。总之,这项研究的结果表明,在纯种狗中,近亲繁殖可能会增加基因组损伤的水平。考虑到基因组损伤与影响动物健康的生理问题增加有关,我们获得的结果可能代表了一种刺激,以阻止在圈养种群中使用密集的近亲繁殖做法,并减少野生种群的分裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mammalian Genome
Mammalian Genome 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mammalian Genome focuses on the experimental, theoretical and technical aspects of genetics, genomics, epigenetics and systems biology in mouse, human and other mammalian species, with an emphasis on the relationship between genotype and phenotype, elucidation of biological and disease pathways as well as experimental aspects of interventions, therapeutics, and precision medicine. The journal aims to publish high quality original papers that present novel findings in all areas of mammalian genetic research as well as review articles on areas of topical interest. The journal will also feature commentaries and editorials to inform readers of breakthrough discoveries as well as issues of research standards, policies and ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信