Thais Freitas Formozo Tillmann, Maria Beatriz Junqueira de Camargo, Andréia Morales Cascaes, Aluísio J. D. Barros, Iná S. Santos, Marcos Britto Corrêa, Alicia Matijasevich, Otávio Pereira D'Ávila, Alexandre Emidio Ribeiro Silva
{"title":"Perception of parents and caregivers about the need for dental appointments for adolescents from a Brazilian birth cohort","authors":"Thais Freitas Formozo Tillmann, Maria Beatriz Junqueira de Camargo, Andréia Morales Cascaes, Aluísio J. D. Barros, Iná S. Santos, Marcos Britto Corrêa, Alicia Matijasevich, Otávio Pereira D'Ávila, Alexandre Emidio Ribeiro Silva","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.12915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the perception of parents or caregivers regarding the need for dental appointments for adolescents aged 12–13 years and associated factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data from the Pelotas 2004 Birth Cohort were used. The outcome variable was the need for dental appointments for young adolescents perceived by parents or caregivers. Demographic and economic exposure variables were obtained from the first (2004) and sixth general follow-up (2015), respectively. The exposure variables ‘previous history of dental pain’, ‘self-rated oral health’, clinical variables and the outcome variable were obtained from the second oral health follow-up (2017). Unadjusted and adjusted multivariate Poisson regression analyses provided prevalence ratios (PR) and respective 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>At the first oral health follow-up (2009), 1303 five-year-old children were recruited, 996 of whom were reassessed and underwent oral health examinations at 12 and 13 years of age (response rate: 76.4%). The findings showed that 72.4% of parents/caregivers perceived that the adolescents needed dental appointments. No associations were found between the outcome and sociodemographic or economic variables. After adjustments, the outcome remained positively associated with previous history of toothache (PR 1.22; 95% CI 1.14–1.32), self-rated oral health as fair or poor (PR 1.26; 95% CI 1.15–1.39), the presence of dental caries (PR 1.27; 95% CI 1.20–1.38) and severe or disabling malocclusion (PR 1.14; 95% CI 1.05–1.25).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The perception of parents/caregivers regarding the need for dental appointments on the part of their adolescent sons and daughters was associated with oral health problems, and these findings can serve as the basis for creating and improving oral health programmes that seek a better understanding on the part of parents and caregivers regarding the importance of integral care for their adolescent children.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdoe.12915","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the perception of parents or caregivers regarding the need for dental appointments for adolescents aged 12–13 years and associated factors.
Methods
Data from the Pelotas 2004 Birth Cohort were used. The outcome variable was the need for dental appointments for young adolescents perceived by parents or caregivers. Demographic and economic exposure variables were obtained from the first (2004) and sixth general follow-up (2015), respectively. The exposure variables ‘previous history of dental pain’, ‘self-rated oral health’, clinical variables and the outcome variable were obtained from the second oral health follow-up (2017). Unadjusted and adjusted multivariate Poisson regression analyses provided prevalence ratios (PR) and respective 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results
At the first oral health follow-up (2009), 1303 five-year-old children were recruited, 996 of whom were reassessed and underwent oral health examinations at 12 and 13 years of age (response rate: 76.4%). The findings showed that 72.4% of parents/caregivers perceived that the adolescents needed dental appointments. No associations were found between the outcome and sociodemographic or economic variables. After adjustments, the outcome remained positively associated with previous history of toothache (PR 1.22; 95% CI 1.14–1.32), self-rated oral health as fair or poor (PR 1.26; 95% CI 1.15–1.39), the presence of dental caries (PR 1.27; 95% CI 1.20–1.38) and severe or disabling malocclusion (PR 1.14; 95% CI 1.05–1.25).
Conclusions
The perception of parents/caregivers regarding the need for dental appointments on the part of their adolescent sons and daughters was associated with oral health problems, and these findings can serve as the basis for creating and improving oral health programmes that seek a better understanding on the part of parents and caregivers regarding the importance of integral care for their adolescent children.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome.
The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry.
The journal is published bimonthly.