Hoarding titmice predominantly use Familiarity, and not Recollection, when remembering cache locations

IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Tom V. Smulders, Laura J. Douglas, Daniel Reza, Lucinda H. Male, Alexander Prysce, Amélie Alix, Alexander de Guzman Dodd, Jenny C. A. Read
{"title":"Hoarding titmice predominantly use Familiarity, and not Recollection, when remembering cache locations","authors":"Tom V. Smulders,&nbsp;Laura J. Douglas,&nbsp;Daniel Reza,&nbsp;Lucinda H. Male,&nbsp;Alexander Prysce,&nbsp;Amélie Alix,&nbsp;Alexander de Guzman Dodd,&nbsp;Jenny C. A. Read","doi":"10.1007/s10071-023-01829-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Scatter-hoarding birds find their caches using spatial memory and have an enlarged hippocampus. Finding a cache site could be achieved using either Recollection (a discrete recalling of previously experienced information) or Familiarity (a feeling of “having encountered something before”). In humans, these two processes can be distinguished using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. ROC curves for olfactory memory in rats have shown the hippocampus is involved in Recollection, but not Familiarity. We test the hypothesis that food-hoarding birds, having a larger hippocampus, primarily use Recollection to find their caches. We validate a novel method of constructing ROC curves in humans and apply this method to cache retrieval by coal tits (<i>Periparus ater</i>). Both humans and birds mainly use Familiarity in finding their caches, with lower contribution of Recollection. This contribution is not significantly different from chance in birds, but a small contribution cannot be ruled out. Memory performance decreases with increasing retention interval in birds. The ecology of food-hoarding Parids makes it plausible that they mainly use Familiarity in the memory for caches. The larger hippocampus could be related to associating cache contents and temporal context with cache locations, rather than Recollection of the spatial information itself.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":"26 6","pages":"1929 - 1943"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10769918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10071-023-01829-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scatter-hoarding birds find their caches using spatial memory and have an enlarged hippocampus. Finding a cache site could be achieved using either Recollection (a discrete recalling of previously experienced information) or Familiarity (a feeling of “having encountered something before”). In humans, these two processes can be distinguished using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. ROC curves for olfactory memory in rats have shown the hippocampus is involved in Recollection, but not Familiarity. We test the hypothesis that food-hoarding birds, having a larger hippocampus, primarily use Recollection to find their caches. We validate a novel method of constructing ROC curves in humans and apply this method to cache retrieval by coal tits (Periparus ater). Both humans and birds mainly use Familiarity in finding their caches, with lower contribution of Recollection. This contribution is not significantly different from chance in birds, but a small contribution cannot be ruled out. Memory performance decreases with increasing retention interval in birds. The ecology of food-hoarding Parids makes it plausible that they mainly use Familiarity in the memory for caches. The larger hippocampus could be related to associating cache contents and temporal context with cache locations, rather than Recollection of the spatial information itself.

Abstract Image

囤积山雀在记忆缓存位置时主要使用熟悉度,而不是重新收集。
零散的囤积鸟类利用空间记忆找到它们的藏匿处,并有一个扩大的海马体。可以使用“回忆”(对以前经历过的信息的离散回忆)或“熟悉”(“以前遇到过什么”的感觉)来找到缓存站点。在人类中,这两个过程可以通过受试者工作特性(ROC)曲线来区分。大鼠嗅觉记忆的ROC曲线显示,海马体参与回忆,但不参与熟悉。我们检验了这样一种假设,即具有较大海马体的囤积食物的鸟类主要使用回忆来寻找它们的储藏处。我们验证了一种在人类中构建ROC曲线的新方法,并将该方法应用于山雀(Periparus ater)的缓存检索。人类和鸟类在寻找藏匿处时都主要使用熟悉度,而重新收集的贡献较小。这种贡献与鸟类的偶然性没有显著差异,但不能排除一小部分贡献。鸟类的记忆性能随着停留时间的增加而下降。食物囤积区的生态环境使得他们主要使用记忆中的熟悉度作为储藏室是合理的。较大的海马体可能与缓存内容和时间上下文与缓存位置的关联有关,而不是空间信息本身的重新收集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Cognition
Animal Cognition 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
125
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Cognition is an interdisciplinary journal offering current research from many disciplines (ethology, behavioral ecology, animal behavior and learning, cognitive sciences, comparative psychology and evolutionary psychology) on all aspects of animal (and human) cognition in an evolutionary framework. Animal Cognition publishes original empirical and theoretical work, reviews, methods papers, short communications and correspondence on the mechanisms and evolution of biologically rooted cognitive-intellectual structures. The journal explores animal time perception and use; causality detection; innate reaction patterns and innate bases of learning; numerical competence and frequency expectancies; symbol use; communication; problem solving, animal thinking and use of tools, and the modularity of the mind.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信