Effects of different organic fertilizers on nitrous oxide and methane emissions from double-cropping rice fields

IF 5.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Mingcheng HU , Andrew J WADE , Weishou SHEN , Zhenfang ZHONG , Chongwen QIU , Xiangui LIN
{"title":"Effects of different organic fertilizers on nitrous oxide and methane emissions from double-cropping rice fields","authors":"Mingcheng HU ,&nbsp;Andrew J WADE ,&nbsp;Weishou SHEN ,&nbsp;Zhenfang ZHONG ,&nbsp;Chongwen QIU ,&nbsp;Xiangui LIN","doi":"10.1016/j.pedsph.2023.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rice fields are a major source of greenhouse gases, such as nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>). Organic fertilizers may potentially replace inorganic fertilizers to meet the nitrogen requirement for rice growth; however, the simultaneous effects of organic fertilizers on N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions and crop yield in paddy fields remain poorly understood and quantified. In this study, experimental plots were established in conventional double-cropping paddy fields in the Pearl River Delta, China, including an unfertilized control and five fertilizer treatments with fresh organic fertilizer (FOF), successively composted organic fertilizer (SOF), chemically composted organic fertilizer (COF), COF supplemented with inorganic fertilizer (COIF), and chemical fertilizers (CFs) (TFOF, TSOF, TCOF, TCOIF, and TCF, respectively). Paddy field soils behaved simultaneously as an N<sub>2</sub>O sink (cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emission: −196 to −381 g N ha<sup>-1</sup>) and as a CH<sub>4</sub> source (cumulative CH<sub>4</sub> emission: 719 to 2 178 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>). Compared to CFs, the effects of organic fertilizers on N<sub>2</sub>O emission were not significant. In contrast, total annual CH<sub>4</sub> emission increased by 157%, 132%, 125%, and 37% in TFOF, TCOF, TSOF, and TCOIF, respectively, compared to TCF. In TCOIF, rice yield was maintained, while CH<sub>4</sub> emission was not significantly increased from the paddy fields characterized by a prolonged flood period. An important next step is to extend these field-based measurements to larger rice cultivation areas to quantify the regional and national-scale impacts on greenhouse gas emissions and to help determine the optimum practice for fertilizer use</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49709,"journal":{"name":"Pedosphere","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 52-62"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1002016023000255/pdfft?md5=028c85c6713ab429b9267ae127199a3c&pid=1-s2.0-S1002016023000255-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedosphere","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1002016023000255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rice fields are a major source of greenhouse gases, such as nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4). Organic fertilizers may potentially replace inorganic fertilizers to meet the nitrogen requirement for rice growth; however, the simultaneous effects of organic fertilizers on N2O and CH4 emissions and crop yield in paddy fields remain poorly understood and quantified. In this study, experimental plots were established in conventional double-cropping paddy fields in the Pearl River Delta, China, including an unfertilized control and five fertilizer treatments with fresh organic fertilizer (FOF), successively composted organic fertilizer (SOF), chemically composted organic fertilizer (COF), COF supplemented with inorganic fertilizer (COIF), and chemical fertilizers (CFs) (TFOF, TSOF, TCOF, TCOIF, and TCF, respectively). Paddy field soils behaved simultaneously as an N2O sink (cumulative N2O emission: −196 to −381 g N ha-1) and as a CH4 source (cumulative CH4 emission: 719 to 2 178 kg ha-1). Compared to CFs, the effects of organic fertilizers on N2O emission were not significant. In contrast, total annual CH4 emission increased by 157%, 132%, 125%, and 37% in TFOF, TCOF, TSOF, and TCOIF, respectively, compared to TCF. In TCOIF, rice yield was maintained, while CH4 emission was not significantly increased from the paddy fields characterized by a prolonged flood period. An important next step is to extend these field-based measurements to larger rice cultivation areas to quantify the regional and national-scale impacts on greenhouse gas emissions and to help determine the optimum practice for fertilizer use

不同生产工艺生产的有机肥料对双季稻田一氧化二氮和甲烷排放的影响
稻田是一氧化二氮(N2O)和甲烷(CH4)等温室气体的主要来源。有机肥料有可能取代无机肥料,满足水稻生长对氮的需求;然而,有机肥料对水稻田中一氧化二氮和甲烷排放以及作物产量的同步影响仍未得到充分了解和量化。本研究在中国珠江三角洲的常规双季稻田中建立了试验田,包括未施肥对照和五种肥料处理,分别为新鲜有机肥(FOF)、连续堆沤有机肥(SOF)、化学堆沤有机肥(COF)、COF 辅以无机肥(COIF)和化肥(CFs)(分别为 TFOF、TSOF、TCOF、TCOIF 和 TCF)。水稻田土壤同时表现为 N2O 吸收汇(累计 N2O 排放量:-196 至 -381 g N ha-1)和 CH4 源(累计 CH4 排放量:719 至 2 178 kg ha-1)。与 CF 相比,有机肥对 N2O 排放的影响并不显著。相反,与 TCF 相比,TFOF、TCOF、TSOF 和 TCOIF 的年 CH4 排放总量分别增加了 157%、132%、125% 和 37%。在 TCOIF 中,水稻产量保持不变,而具有长期洪水期特征的稻田的甲烷排放量没有显著增加。下一步的重要工作是将这些实地测量结果推广到更大的水稻种植区,以量化区域和国家尺度对温室气体排放的影响,并帮助确定最佳的肥料使用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pedosphere
Pedosphere 环境科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
1.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
5.0 months
期刊介绍: PEDOSPHERE—a peer-reviewed international journal published bimonthly in English—welcomes submissions from scientists around the world under a broad scope of topics relevant to timely, high quality original research findings, especially up-to-date achievements and advances in the entire field of soil science studies dealing with environmental science, ecology, agriculture, bioscience, geoscience, forestry, etc. It publishes mainly original research articles as well as some reviews, mini reviews, short communications and special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信