Development and Evaluation of Electronic Social Needs Assessment and Resource Connection Tool in Facilitating Utilization of Community Services That Address Upstream Health

Heather Farthing, Sarah Simko, Francelia J. Eckembrecher, Daphne G. Eckembrecher, Isabel C. Penabad, Yanelys Fernandez, Veronica Nunez, Sophia Pines, Nicole Cruz, Rebecca Tanenbaum, Berta Cabrera, Luz Gallardo, Erin Kobetz
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of Electronic Social Needs Assessment and Resource Connection Tool in Facilitating Utilization of Community Services That Address Upstream Health","authors":"Heather Farthing, Sarah Simko, Francelia J. Eckembrecher, Daphne G. Eckembrecher, Isabel C. Penabad, Yanelys Fernandez, Veronica Nunez, Sophia Pines, Nicole Cruz, Rebecca Tanenbaum, Berta Cabrera, Luz Gallardo, Erin Kobetz","doi":"10.59586/jsrc.v7i1.181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Social determinants of health (SDOH) put some groups who access care at student-run free clinics (SRFCs) at higher risk for adverse medical outcomes. Free or low-cost community services supplement clinic-based interventions, but access is limited by knowledge, transportation, language, and/or trust. Social needs assessments may be electronically paired with resource connection tools to connect patients to local, validated resources. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the SDOH screen and resource connection tool developed at a SRFC. \nMethods: The tool was piloted with a convenience sample of 40 patients with scheduled outpatient appointments at a SRFC in Miami, Florida. Participants were given information about a variety of services and screened for high-risk situations such as human trafficking. Follow-up survey via telephone at 2-4 weeks identified survey acceptability, successful connections, and barriers to access. \nResults: Forty participants completed the assessment. All participants were counseled regarding exercise and nutrition and requested information about more than one resource. Sixty percent (n=24) were successfully contacted for follow-up. Of these, 29% (n=7) were able to connect with one or more recommended resources. Reasons given for failure to access resources included lack of time or transportation, health issues, and lack of response from contacted organizations. \nConclusions: Social needs assessments may be implemented in SRFCs to identify high-risk needs, facilitate linkage to local organizations that meet these needs, gather data to guide future programming, and provide education and counseling. Stronger connections with local organizations and closed loop referrals may be needed to facilitate connection to community resources.","PeriodicalId":73958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of student-run clinics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of student-run clinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59586/jsrc.v7i1.181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Social determinants of health (SDOH) put some groups who access care at student-run free clinics (SRFCs) at higher risk for adverse medical outcomes. Free or low-cost community services supplement clinic-based interventions, but access is limited by knowledge, transportation, language, and/or trust. Social needs assessments may be electronically paired with resource connection tools to connect patients to local, validated resources. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the SDOH screen and resource connection tool developed at a SRFC. Methods: The tool was piloted with a convenience sample of 40 patients with scheduled outpatient appointments at a SRFC in Miami, Florida. Participants were given information about a variety of services and screened for high-risk situations such as human trafficking. Follow-up survey via telephone at 2-4 weeks identified survey acceptability, successful connections, and barriers to access. Results: Forty participants completed the assessment. All participants were counseled regarding exercise and nutrition and requested information about more than one resource. Sixty percent (n=24) were successfully contacted for follow-up. Of these, 29% (n=7) were able to connect with one or more recommended resources. Reasons given for failure to access resources included lack of time or transportation, health issues, and lack of response from contacted organizations. Conclusions: Social needs assessments may be implemented in SRFCs to identify high-risk needs, facilitate linkage to local organizations that meet these needs, gather data to guide future programming, and provide education and counseling. Stronger connections with local organizations and closed loop referrals may be needed to facilitate connection to community resources.
电子社会需求评估和资源连接工具的开发和评估,以促进社区服务的利用,解决上游健康问题
背景:健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)使一些在学生开办的免费诊所(SRFC)获得护理的群体面临更高的不良医疗后果风险。免费或低成本的社区服务补充了基于诊所的干预措施,但获得服务的机会受到知识、交通、语言和/或信任的限制。社会需求评估可以与资源连接工具电子配对,将患者连接到本地经验证的资源。本试点研究的目的是评估SRFC开发的SDOH屏幕和资源连接工具。方法:该工具在佛罗里达州迈阿密的一家SRFC对40名预约门诊的患者进行了便利抽样试验。向参与者提供了有关各种服务的信息,并对其进行了人口贩运等高风险情况的筛查。2-4周通过电话进行的后续调查确定了调查的可接受性、成功的联系和访问障碍。结果:40名参与者完成了评估。所有参与者都接受了有关锻炼和营养的咨询,并要求提供有关不止一种资源的信息。60%(n=24)的患者成功联系进行随访。其中,29%(n=7)能够连接到一个或多个推荐资源。未能获得资源的原因包括缺乏时间或交通、健康问题以及联系的组织缺乏回应。结论:社会需求评估可以在SRFC中实施,以确定高风险需求,促进与满足这些需求的地方组织的联系,收集数据以指导未来的规划,并提供教育和咨询。可能需要加强与当地组织的联系和闭环推荐,以促进与社区资源的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信