Pathways to Statehood—A Commentary on Secession and the Sovereignty Game: Strategy and Tactics for Aspiring Nations by Ryan D. Griffiths

IF 1.2 Q3 ETHNIC STUDIES
Argyro Kartsonaki
{"title":"Pathways to Statehood—A Commentary on Secession and the Sovereignty Game: Strategy and Tactics for Aspiring Nations by Ryan D. Griffiths","authors":"Argyro Kartsonaki","doi":"10.1080/17449057.2022.2124675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his magni fi cent book Secession and the Sovereignty Game, Ryan D. Grif fi ths (2021) captures everything one needs to know about the strategy and the tactics of secessionist movements. It is a book about the sovereignty game, its setting and basic rules, what seces-sionists can try to achieve within its context, and how they go about it. Through rigorous mixed methods research, Grif fi ths develops a compelling argument about the tactics seces-sionists employ in their attempts to achieve the ultimate goal of every secessionist group — admittance to the club of independent states. Grif fi ths ’ main argument revolves around the strategy and the tactics of secession. He is brave enough to declare that the strategic fi eld of secession is the same for all secessionist groups. This is not an easy argument to pull off. But indeed there is one international system, one UN, and one goal: international recognition. Other outcomes are secondary options secessionists are forced to accept in lieu of the best-case scenario. The main hurdle any secessionist movement must jump on its path to independent statehood is to convince the home state to consent to its secession. Without this consent, admittance to the club of sovereign states is nearly impossible. Theoretically, there could be another way. The aspiring state could bypass the home state and try to secure international recognition in the form of UN membership through the international community. This would involve convincing at least nine of the fi fteen member states of the UN Security Council to approve admission to the organisation, without any vetoes from the fi ve permanent members. Then the application would also have to be approved by a two-thirds majority of the General Assembly. Although theoretically plausible, history has shown","PeriodicalId":46452,"journal":{"name":"Ethnopolitics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnopolitics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2022.2124675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In his magni fi cent book Secession and the Sovereignty Game, Ryan D. Grif fi ths (2021) captures everything one needs to know about the strategy and the tactics of secessionist movements. It is a book about the sovereignty game, its setting and basic rules, what seces-sionists can try to achieve within its context, and how they go about it. Through rigorous mixed methods research, Grif fi ths develops a compelling argument about the tactics seces-sionists employ in their attempts to achieve the ultimate goal of every secessionist group — admittance to the club of independent states. Grif fi ths ’ main argument revolves around the strategy and the tactics of secession. He is brave enough to declare that the strategic fi eld of secession is the same for all secessionist groups. This is not an easy argument to pull off. But indeed there is one international system, one UN, and one goal: international recognition. Other outcomes are secondary options secessionists are forced to accept in lieu of the best-case scenario. The main hurdle any secessionist movement must jump on its path to independent statehood is to convince the home state to consent to its secession. Without this consent, admittance to the club of sovereign states is nearly impossible. Theoretically, there could be another way. The aspiring state could bypass the home state and try to secure international recognition in the form of UN membership through the international community. This would involve convincing at least nine of the fi fteen member states of the UN Security Council to approve admission to the organisation, without any vetoes from the fi ve permanent members. Then the application would also have to be approved by a two-thirds majority of the General Assembly. Although theoretically plausible, history has shown
建国之路——评格里菲斯的《分裂与主权游戏:有抱负的国家的战略与策略》
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethnopolitics
Ethnopolitics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信