Post-apocalyptic Subjectivity and Nature/Culture Duality in Lois Lowry’s The Giver

IF 0.1 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
Younes Poorghorban, Bakhtiar Sadjadi
{"title":"Post-apocalyptic Subjectivity and Nature/Culture Duality in Lois Lowry’s The Giver","authors":"Younes Poorghorban, Bakhtiar Sadjadi","doi":"10.54103/2037-2426/18620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present inquiry endeavors to scrutinize the process of identity formation with regard to the Culture/Nature dichotomy within the milieu of Lois Lowry's post-apocalyptic dystopian narrative, The Giver. The antipodal forces of Culture and Nature are instrumental in shaping the social subjectivities of individuals. Lowry's post-apocalyptic dystopia portrays a society in which these antitheses are comprehensively epitomized. Our objective is to explicate the genesis of post-apocalyptic identities and to elucidate the representation of Nature/Culture within the social context of the aforementioned literary work. Furthermore, the polarity between power and resistance, which is of notable import to cultural studies, is nonexistent within this post-apocalyptic dystopia. Consequently, the establishment of identities transpires not at the site of contention between power and resistance, but exclusively through the ascendency of the imperializing power. As a corollary, the elimination of the recollections of those individuals who are unable to oppose the imperializing power is integral to the construction of homogeneous identities.","PeriodicalId":41992,"journal":{"name":"Enthymema-International Journal of Literary Criticism Literary Theory and Philosophy of Literature","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enthymema-International Journal of Literary Criticism Literary Theory and Philosophy of Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/2037-2426/18620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present inquiry endeavors to scrutinize the process of identity formation with regard to the Culture/Nature dichotomy within the milieu of Lois Lowry's post-apocalyptic dystopian narrative, The Giver. The antipodal forces of Culture and Nature are instrumental in shaping the social subjectivities of individuals. Lowry's post-apocalyptic dystopia portrays a society in which these antitheses are comprehensively epitomized. Our objective is to explicate the genesis of post-apocalyptic identities and to elucidate the representation of Nature/Culture within the social context of the aforementioned literary work. Furthermore, the polarity between power and resistance, which is of notable import to cultural studies, is nonexistent within this post-apocalyptic dystopia. Consequently, the establishment of identities transpires not at the site of contention between power and resistance, but exclusively through the ascendency of the imperializing power. As a corollary, the elimination of the recollections of those individuals who are unable to oppose the imperializing power is integral to the construction of homogeneous identities.
洛伊斯·洛瑞《给予者》中的后启示录主体性与自然文化二元性
本研究试图在洛伊斯·洛瑞的后启示录反乌托邦叙事《传授者》的背景下,审视文化/自然二分法的身份形成过程。文化和自然的反足力量有助于塑造个人的社会主体性。洛瑞的后世界末日反乌托邦描绘了一个社会,在这个社会中,这些对立是全面的缩影。我们的目标是阐明后启示录身份的起源,并阐明自然/文化在上述文学作品的社会背景下的表现。此外,在这个后世界末日的反乌托邦中,权力和抵抗之间的极性是不存在的,这对文化研究具有重要意义。因此,身份的确立不是在权力和抵抗之间的争论中发生的,而是完全通过统治权力的崛起而发生的。因此,消除那些无法反对专制权力的人的回忆,是构建同质身份不可或缺的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信