Geomorphic diversity and landslide susceptibility in the Balason River Basin, Darjeeling Himalaya

Q2 Engineering
S. Mondal, S. Mandal
{"title":"Geomorphic diversity and landslide susceptibility in the Balason River Basin, Darjeeling Himalaya","authors":"S. Mondal, S. Mandal","doi":"10.33430/v27n1thie2017-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study attempts to assess the role of basin morphometric parameters in slope instability using a morphometric diversity (MD) model, as well as the role of drainage parameters and relief parameters in slope failure using drainage diversity (DD) and relief diversity (RD) models, respectively. For this, a total of 14 morphometric data layers were\nconsidered. The relationship of each data layer to landslide susceptibility was judged using a frequency ratio (FR) approach. Parameters like drainage density (Dd), drainage frequency (Df), relative relief (Rr), drainage texture (Dt), junction frequency (Jf), infiltration number (In), ruggedness index (Ri), dissection index (Di), elevation (E), slope (S), relief ratio (Rra) and hypsometric integral (Hi) were positively related with landslide potentiality while bifurcation ratio (Rb) and drainage intensity (Din) negatively correlated with S failure. The principal component analysis (PCA)-based weight assigned to each data layer in each model was multiplied with unidirectional reclassified data layers for each model using a weighted linear combination (WLC) approach to prepare landslide susceptibility maps. The receiver operating characteristics curve showed that the landslide prediction accuracy of the DD, RD and MD models were 71.4%, 73.9% and 76.3%, respectively. The FR plots of the aforesaid three models suggested that the chance of landslide increases from very low to very high in susceptible zones.","PeriodicalId":35587,"journal":{"name":"Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers","volume":"27 1","pages":"13-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33430/v27n1thie2017-0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study attempts to assess the role of basin morphometric parameters in slope instability using a morphometric diversity (MD) model, as well as the role of drainage parameters and relief parameters in slope failure using drainage diversity (DD) and relief diversity (RD) models, respectively. For this, a total of 14 morphometric data layers were considered. The relationship of each data layer to landslide susceptibility was judged using a frequency ratio (FR) approach. Parameters like drainage density (Dd), drainage frequency (Df), relative relief (Rr), drainage texture (Dt), junction frequency (Jf), infiltration number (In), ruggedness index (Ri), dissection index (Di), elevation (E), slope (S), relief ratio (Rra) and hypsometric integral (Hi) were positively related with landslide potentiality while bifurcation ratio (Rb) and drainage intensity (Din) negatively correlated with S failure. The principal component analysis (PCA)-based weight assigned to each data layer in each model was multiplied with unidirectional reclassified data layers for each model using a weighted linear combination (WLC) approach to prepare landslide susceptibility maps. The receiver operating characteristics curve showed that the landslide prediction accuracy of the DD, RD and MD models were 71.4%, 73.9% and 76.3%, respectively. The FR plots of the aforesaid three models suggested that the chance of landslide increases from very low to very high in susceptible zones.
大吉岭喜马拉雅巴拉逊河流域的地貌多样性和滑坡易感性
本研究试图使用形态多样性(MD)模型评估盆地形态计量参数在边坡失稳中的作用,并分别使用排水多样性(DD)和起伏多样性(RD)模型评估排水参数和起伏参数在边坡破坏中的作用。为此,共考虑了14个形态测量数据层。使用频率比(FR)方法判断每个数据层与滑坡易感性的关系。排水密度(Dd)、排水频率(Df)、相对起伏(Rr)、排水质地(Dt)、交界频率(Jf)、入渗数(In)、粗糙度指数(Ri)、剥离指数(Di)、高程(E)、坡度(S),起伏比(Rra)和高度积分(Hi)与滑坡潜势呈正相关,分叉比(Rb)和排水强度(Din)与S破坏呈负相关。使用加权线性组合(WLC)方法,将分配给每个模型中每个数据层的基于主成分分析(PCA)的权重与每个模型的单向重新分类数据层相乘,以编制滑坡易发性图。接收器工作特性曲线显示,DD、RD和MD模型的滑坡预测准确率分别为71.4%、73.9%和76.3%。上述三个模型的FR图表明,在易感区,滑坡发生的几率从很低增加到很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers
Transactions Hong Kong Institution of Engineers Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信