Opioid Free Anesthesia versus Opioid Based Anesthesia for Hemodynamic Stability in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery, A Randomized Comparative Study

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Dalia Khaled, Osama Mohamed, Iman Alaa, Antony Adel
{"title":"Opioid Free Anesthesia versus Opioid Based Anesthesia for Hemodynamic Stability in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery, A Randomized Comparative Study","authors":"Dalia Khaled, Osama Mohamed, Iman Alaa, Antony Adel","doi":"10.1080/11101849.2023.2238531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Physiological and pharmacological variances from younger patients make geriatric patients anesthetically challenging. Opioids though effectively controlling pain may cause serious complications in elderly. Non-opioid analgesics are being considered for adequate analgesia with fewer complications. Methods Reaching OR, MAP and HR were recorded (T0), thirty patients were assigned into: OFA group received dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg over 10 min loading dose, then infusing dexmedetomidine (0.3 µg/kg/h), lidocaine (2 mg/kg/h) and magnesium sulfate (1.5 g/h) during surgery and OA group received fentanyl 2 µg/kg loading dose then infusion (1 µg/kg/h) during surgery. MAP and HR were documented after starting infusions (T1), after intubation (T2), visualizing surgical field with arthroscope (T3) then every 10 min till end. Surgeon graded surgical field (T3) then every 10 min till end. Postoperatively OAA/S, MAP and HR were recorded. NRS was assessed in PACU, at 1 h, 2 h, 8 h, 16 h and 24 h. Patients scoring ≥ 4 received paracetamol 1 gm IV infusion (4 g/24 h maximum dose) documenting first 24 hours total dose and postoperative complications. AMT was assessed postoperatively for three days. Patients scoring<8 were presumed having postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and were psychiatrically assessed. Results MAP and endoscopic surgical field grading (T3) were significantly lower in OFA group than OA group (P values 0.008 and 0.001). MAP was significantly lower in OFA group intraoperative (T3 till T9) and two postoperative hours. HR was significantly lower in OFA group at T3 till surgery end and two postoperative hours (except T13). NRS scores were significantly higher in OA group at P0 and P1 than OFA group (P-value 0.001 and 0.007). Postoperative paracetamol dose was significantly higher in OA group than OFA group (P-value 0.005). Conclusion OFA offered better hemodynamic control, endoscopic surgical field grading, lower NRS readings and paracetamol dose, presenting better anesthetic option for elderly undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery with no POCD or other postoperative complications.","PeriodicalId":11437,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2238531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Physiological and pharmacological variances from younger patients make geriatric patients anesthetically challenging. Opioids though effectively controlling pain may cause serious complications in elderly. Non-opioid analgesics are being considered for adequate analgesia with fewer complications. Methods Reaching OR, MAP and HR were recorded (T0), thirty patients were assigned into: OFA group received dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg over 10 min loading dose, then infusing dexmedetomidine (0.3 µg/kg/h), lidocaine (2 mg/kg/h) and magnesium sulfate (1.5 g/h) during surgery and OA group received fentanyl 2 µg/kg loading dose then infusion (1 µg/kg/h) during surgery. MAP and HR were documented after starting infusions (T1), after intubation (T2), visualizing surgical field with arthroscope (T3) then every 10 min till end. Surgeon graded surgical field (T3) then every 10 min till end. Postoperatively OAA/S, MAP and HR were recorded. NRS was assessed in PACU, at 1 h, 2 h, 8 h, 16 h and 24 h. Patients scoring ≥ 4 received paracetamol 1 gm IV infusion (4 g/24 h maximum dose) documenting first 24 hours total dose and postoperative complications. AMT was assessed postoperatively for three days. Patients scoring<8 were presumed having postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and were psychiatrically assessed. Results MAP and endoscopic surgical field grading (T3) were significantly lower in OFA group than OA group (P values 0.008 and 0.001). MAP was significantly lower in OFA group intraoperative (T3 till T9) and two postoperative hours. HR was significantly lower in OFA group at T3 till surgery end and two postoperative hours (except T13). NRS scores were significantly higher in OA group at P0 and P1 than OFA group (P-value 0.001 and 0.007). Postoperative paracetamol dose was significantly higher in OA group than OFA group (P-value 0.005). Conclusion OFA offered better hemodynamic control, endoscopic surgical field grading, lower NRS readings and paracetamol dose, presenting better anesthetic option for elderly undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery with no POCD or other postoperative complications.
无阿片类麻醉与阿片类药物麻醉对老年肩关节镜手术患者血液动力学稳定性的随机比较研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信