A prospective study on efficacy of topical bupivacaine in split skin grafting donor site in immediate postoperative pain relief

Srikanth Vasudevan, S. Nagireddy, A. Chandrappa, Y. Anantheshwar, R. Batth, Harish Kablian, Dinkar Sreekumar
{"title":"A prospective study on efficacy of topical bupivacaine in split skin grafting donor site in immediate postoperative pain relief","authors":"Srikanth Vasudevan, S. Nagireddy, A. Chandrappa, Y. Anantheshwar, R. Batth, Harish Kablian, Dinkar Sreekumar","doi":"10.4103/ijb.ijb_2_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of bupivacaine-soaked gauze dressing and conventional dressing for pain relief in patients requiring split-thickness skin graft for reconstruction of various defects. Methodology: Fifty patients requiring split-thickness skin grafting for various soft-tissue defects were divided into two groups with 25 patients in each group. In Group A, skin graft donor site dressing was kept moist with 10 mL/100 cm2 of 0.25% bupivacaine solution-soaked gauze, and in Group B, dressing was moistened with the same amount of normal saline-soaked gauze. Outcome was measured by comparing pain scores and calculating rescue analgesia requirements in the two groups in the first 24 h. Significance was determined by comparing analgesia-sparing effect of each dressing using Chi-square test. Results: In Group A, 1 out of 25 (4%) patients required rescue analgesia. In Group B, 23 out of 25 (92%) patients required rescue analgesia (P < 0.0001). There was 96% effectiveness of bupivacaine-soaked dressing while only 8% effectiveness of conventional dressing. Conclusion: Bupivacaine-soaked dressing should be considered as a potent alternative to traditional saline dressings for the skin graft donor site.","PeriodicalId":13336,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of burns","volume":"28 1","pages":"18 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of burns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijb.ijb_2_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of bupivacaine-soaked gauze dressing and conventional dressing for pain relief in patients requiring split-thickness skin graft for reconstruction of various defects. Methodology: Fifty patients requiring split-thickness skin grafting for various soft-tissue defects were divided into two groups with 25 patients in each group. In Group A, skin graft donor site dressing was kept moist with 10 mL/100 cm2 of 0.25% bupivacaine solution-soaked gauze, and in Group B, dressing was moistened with the same amount of normal saline-soaked gauze. Outcome was measured by comparing pain scores and calculating rescue analgesia requirements in the two groups in the first 24 h. Significance was determined by comparing analgesia-sparing effect of each dressing using Chi-square test. Results: In Group A, 1 out of 25 (4%) patients required rescue analgesia. In Group B, 23 out of 25 (92%) patients required rescue analgesia (P < 0.0001). There was 96% effectiveness of bupivacaine-soaked dressing while only 8% effectiveness of conventional dressing. Conclusion: Bupivacaine-soaked dressing should be considered as a potent alternative to traditional saline dressings for the skin graft donor site.
局部布比卡因用于皮片供皮区术后即刻止痛的前瞻性研究
目的:本研究的目的是比较布比卡因浸泡纱布敷料和传统敷料在需要中厚皮片重建各种缺损的患者中的止痛效果。方法:将50例因各种软组织缺损需要分层植皮的患者分为两组,每组25例。在A组中,用10mL/100cm2的0.25%布比卡因溶液浸泡的纱布保持皮肤移植供体部位敷料的湿润,在B组中,使用等量的生理盐水浸泡的纱布湿润敷料。通过比较两组在前24小时内的疼痛评分和计算抢救镇痛需求来测量结果。通过卡方检验比较每种敷料的镇痛保留效果来确定显著性。结果:A组25例患者中有1例(4%)需要抢救性镇痛。在B组,25名患者中有23名(92%)需要抢救性镇痛(P<0.0001)。布比卡因浸泡敷料的有效性为96%,而传统敷料的有效率仅为8%。结论:布比卡因浸泡敷料应被认为是一种有效的替代传统盐水敷料的皮肤移植供体部位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信