Emotional Feelings: Evaluative Perceptions or Position-Takings? Introduction to the Special Section

IF 3 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Emotion Review Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1177/17540739221127656

R. Reisenzein, Philipp Schmidt

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special section of Emotion Review is devoted to the discussion of a recent philosophical emotion theory, the theory of emotions as affective position-takings (Jean Moritz Müller, The World-Directedness of Emotional Feeling: On Affect and Intentionality, Palgrave MacMillan, 2019). The aims of the special section are to provide readers with a spotlight view of recent research in the philosophy of emotion, to advance emotion theory, and support the interdisciplinary dialogue. To increase the accessibility of the special section texts to a nonphilosophical readership, we first discuss the relationship between the philosophy and the psychology of emotions and give a brief review the main types of theories of emotional experience.

查看原文本刊更多论文

情感感受：评估感知还是立场？专题介绍

《情感评论》的这一特别部分专门讨论了最近的一种哲学情感理论，即情感作为情感立场的理论（Jean Moritz Müller，《情感的世界导向性：论情感和意向性》，Palgrave MacMillan，2019）。特别部分的目的是为读者提供情感哲学最新研究的聚光灯视野，推进情感理论，并支持跨学科对话。为了增加非哲学读者对专论文本的可及性，我们首先讨论了哲学与情感心理学之间的关系，并简要回顾了情感体验的主要理论类型。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Emotion Review PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

6.60

自引率

3.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Emotion Review is a fully peer reviewed scholarly journal. It adheres to a blinded peer review process in which the reviewer"s name is routinely withheld from the author unless the reviewer requests a preference for their identity to be revealed. All manuscripts are reviewed initially by the Editors and only those papers that meet the scientific and editorial standards of the journal, and fit within the aims and scope of the journal, will be sent for outside review. Emotion Review will focus on ideas about emotion, with "emotion" broadly defined. The Review will publish articles presenting new theories, offering conceptual analyses, reviewing the literature, and debating and critiquing conceptual issues.