A long and troublesome journey: People's perceptions and attitudes along the migratory path of a scavenger bird

IF 1.6 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Fernando Ballejo, M. G. Grilli, Sergio A. Lambertucci
{"title":"A long and troublesome journey: People's perceptions and attitudes along the migratory path of a scavenger bird","authors":"Fernando Ballejo, M. G. Grilli, Sergio A. Lambertucci","doi":"10.15451/ec2019-10-8.13-1-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, there has been a growing interest in integrating the social sciences and conservation studies to inform a more realistic management approach. Indeed, an understanding of people's perception of fauna helps in the evaluation of possible conflicts with humans, and provides tools to solve these conflicts. However, perceptions may change along different parts of a species' geographical distribution. Scavenger birds are not exempt from these conflicts as many farmers blame them for attacking and killing livestock. We evaluated the knowledge, perceptions and attitude of people regarding New World vultures along a migratory path in South America. We conducted 114 interviews with farmers in six different localities between Argentine Patagonia and central Bolivia. About half (48.2%) of the interviewees considered vultures harmful to livestock and a substantial number (24.5%) considered killing these birds as a solution for the conflict. The perception of the damage caused by these birds was worse in vultures' wintering and breeding areas, than along the migration route. People with a higher level of education and greater numbers of livestock exhibited more negative perceptions. However, many people (53%) still believed that scavenger birds are important for the environment. Our results suggest that acknowledgment of services provided by scavengers makes killing of scavengers less likely. Educational strategies are needed to increase levels of appreciation toward the ecosystem services provided by vultures, over those of perceived damages.","PeriodicalId":44826,"journal":{"name":"Ethnobiology and Conservation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnobiology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2019-10-8.13-1-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

In recent decades, there has been a growing interest in integrating the social sciences and conservation studies to inform a more realistic management approach. Indeed, an understanding of people's perception of fauna helps in the evaluation of possible conflicts with humans, and provides tools to solve these conflicts. However, perceptions may change along different parts of a species' geographical distribution. Scavenger birds are not exempt from these conflicts as many farmers blame them for attacking and killing livestock. We evaluated the knowledge, perceptions and attitude of people regarding New World vultures along a migratory path in South America. We conducted 114 interviews with farmers in six different localities between Argentine Patagonia and central Bolivia. About half (48.2%) of the interviewees considered vultures harmful to livestock and a substantial number (24.5%) considered killing these birds as a solution for the conflict. The perception of the damage caused by these birds was worse in vultures' wintering and breeding areas, than along the migration route. People with a higher level of education and greater numbers of livestock exhibited more negative perceptions. However, many people (53%) still believed that scavenger birds are important for the environment. Our results suggest that acknowledgment of services provided by scavengers makes killing of scavengers less likely. Educational strategies are needed to increase levels of appreciation toward the ecosystem services provided by vultures, over those of perceived damages.
漫长而麻烦的旅程:人们对食腐鸟迁徙路线的看法和态度
近几十年来,人们对整合社会科学和保护研究以提供更现实的管理方法越来越感兴趣。事实上,了解人们对动物的看法有助于评估与人类可能发生的冲突,并为解决这些冲突提供工具。然而,认知可能会随着物种地理分布的不同部分而变化。拾荒鸟也不能免受这些冲突的影响,因为许多农民指责它们攻击和杀害牲畜。我们评估了人们对南美洲迁徙路线上的新大陆秃鹫的了解、看法和态度。我们对阿根廷巴塔哥尼亚和玻利维亚中部六个不同地区的农民进行了114次采访。大约一半(48.2%)的受访者认为秃鹫对牲畜有害,相当多的人(24.5%)认为杀死这些鸟是解决冲突的办法。与迁徙路线相比,秃鹫在越冬和繁殖区对这些鸟类造成的伤害更为严重。受教育程度越高、牲畜数量越多的人表现出更多的负面看法。然而,许多人(53%)仍然认为食腐鸟对环境很重要。我们的研究结果表明,承认拾荒者提供的服务会降低杀害拾荒者的可能性。需要教育策略来提高人们对秃鹫提供的生态系统服务的欣赏程度,而不是对感知到的破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethnobiology and Conservation
Ethnobiology and Conservation BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
21.40%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Ethnobiology and Conservation (EC) is an open access and peer-reviewed online journal that publishes original contributions in all fields of ethnobiology and conservation of nature. The scope of EC includes traditional ecological knowledge, human ecology, ethnoecology, ethnopharmacology, ecological anthropology, and history and philosophy of science. Contributions in the area of conservation of nature can involve studies that are normally in the field of traditional ecological studies, as well as in animal and plant biology, ethology, biogeography, management of fauna and flora, and ethical and legal aspects about the conservation of biodiversity. However, all papers should focus explicitly on their contribution to the conservation of nature. Merely descriptive papers without a theoretical discussion contextualized from the findings, although possibly being accepted, will not be given priority for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信