Wybrane zagadnienia dotyczące przetwarzania danych osobowych w procedurze rozstrzygania sporów zbiorowych

IF 0.1 Q4 Social Sciences
J. Szmit
{"title":"Wybrane zagadnienia dotyczące przetwarzania danych osobowych w procedurze rozstrzygania sporów zbiorowych","authors":"J. Szmit","doi":"10.7206/kp.2080-1084.515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is analyse how essential the issue of personal data protection is in the procedure of leading a collective dispute. In order to make some findings in this matter, the dogmatic and legal method was primarily used and the provisions of the Act on Resolving Collective Disputes and the GDPR were analysed in the first place. The findings made lead to the conclusion that despite the fact that the dispute itself is collective, both parties (both the trade union and the employer) process a range of personal data during the dispute. Due to the specifics of the procedure and the fact that the Act was essentially created before the GDPR came into force and it was not amended for the inclusion of broadly understood requirements for the correctness of the processing of personal data, it is necessary to rely on general principles resulting from the GDPR, and a certain indicator of it may be opinions issued by the PDPO. The issue raised in this paper has so far been included in certain statements from the doctrine, but its practical significance and importance for social partners who execute their constitutional right to lead collective disputes fully justify further research in this direction as well as the fact of findings resulting from that research reaching various target groups (apart from the above-mentioned social partners, representatives of the judicature and science should also be reached).","PeriodicalId":36398,"journal":{"name":"Krytyka Prawa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Krytyka Prawa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the article is analyse how essential the issue of personal data protection is in the procedure of leading a collective dispute. In order to make some findings in this matter, the dogmatic and legal method was primarily used and the provisions of the Act on Resolving Collective Disputes and the GDPR were analysed in the first place. The findings made lead to the conclusion that despite the fact that the dispute itself is collective, both parties (both the trade union and the employer) process a range of personal data during the dispute. Due to the specifics of the procedure and the fact that the Act was essentially created before the GDPR came into force and it was not amended for the inclusion of broadly understood requirements for the correctness of the processing of personal data, it is necessary to rely on general principles resulting from the GDPR, and a certain indicator of it may be opinions issued by the PDPO. The issue raised in this paper has so far been included in certain statements from the doctrine, but its practical significance and importance for social partners who execute their constitutional right to lead collective disputes fully justify further research in this direction as well as the fact of findings resulting from that research reaching various target groups (apart from the above-mentioned social partners, representatives of the judicature and science should also be reached).
集体争议解决程序中处理个人数据的选定问题
本文的目的是分析个人数据保护问题在引发集体纠纷的程序中的重要性。为了在这一问题上得出一些结论,主要使用了教条主义和法律方法,并首先分析了《解决集体争议法》和《通用数据保护条例》的规定。调查结果得出的结论是,尽管争议本身是集体的,但双方(工会和雇主)在争议期间都会处理一系列个人数据。由于程序的具体性,以及该法案基本上是在《通用数据保护条例》生效之前制定的,并且没有为了纳入对个人数据处理正确性的广泛理解的要求而对其进行修订,因此有必要依赖《通用数据保护条例》产生的一般原则,其中的某个指标可能是《隐私保护条例》发布的意见。到目前为止,本文中提出的问题已包含在该学说的某些陈述中,但它对行使宪法赋予的领导集体争议权利的社会伙伴的现实意义和重要性,充分证明了朝着这个方向进一步研究的合理性,以及该研究的结果惠及各个目标群体的事实(除了上述社会伙伴,还应接触司法和科学的代表)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Krytyka Prawa
Krytyka Prawa Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信