Post-Soviet De Facto States in the Theory of Small States

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Barbara Baarova, Vladimír Baar
{"title":"Post-Soviet De Facto States in the Theory of Small States","authors":"Barbara Baarova, Vladimír Baar","doi":"10.24040/politickevedy.2022.25.4.8-42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With their geographic and economic dimensions, post-Soviet de facto states are very small structures, yet they have existed for over a quarter of a century. This means that they have already had a generation that has no connection with the mother state from which they have separated. However, because the patron of their independence is (or, in the case of Artsakh, indirectly) Russia, which even officially recognized two of them (Abkhazia and South Ossetia-Alania), many authors keep observing their development. Their geopolitical importance significantly increased after the Russian aggression in Ukraine. Unrecognized states cannot be open economies, even if they wanted. In addition, in the case of post-Soviet de facto states, these are underdeveloped economies with high import costs and whose products are characterized by low competitiveness. The submitted contribution focuses on these structures from the point of view of the theory of small states. Based on geographic, demographic, economic and historical indicators, as well as the ability to resist reintegration, they suggest their theoretical possibilities of defending factual independence and gaining wider international recognition. The theory of small states shows in practice that the benefits of \"smallness\" cannot be used by de facto states to strengthen their political and economic prestige precisely because of the absence of international recognition and the rivalry of large states over geopolitical influence.","PeriodicalId":42158,"journal":{"name":"Politicke Vedy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politicke Vedy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2022.25.4.8-42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With their geographic and economic dimensions, post-Soviet de facto states are very small structures, yet they have existed for over a quarter of a century. This means that they have already had a generation that has no connection with the mother state from which they have separated. However, because the patron of their independence is (or, in the case of Artsakh, indirectly) Russia, which even officially recognized two of them (Abkhazia and South Ossetia-Alania), many authors keep observing their development. Their geopolitical importance significantly increased after the Russian aggression in Ukraine. Unrecognized states cannot be open economies, even if they wanted. In addition, in the case of post-Soviet de facto states, these are underdeveloped economies with high import costs and whose products are characterized by low competitiveness. The submitted contribution focuses on these structures from the point of view of the theory of small states. Based on geographic, demographic, economic and historical indicators, as well as the ability to resist reintegration, they suggest their theoretical possibilities of defending factual independence and gaining wider international recognition. The theory of small states shows in practice that the benefits of "smallness" cannot be used by de facto states to strengthen their political and economic prestige precisely because of the absence of international recognition and the rivalry of large states over geopolitical influence.
小国理论中的后苏联事实国家
就其地理和经济层面而言,后苏联事实上的国家是非常小的结构,但它们已经存在了四分之一个多世纪。这意味着他们已经有了一代人,与他们分离的母亲国没有任何联系。然而,由于他们独立的赞助人是(或者,就阿尔察赫而言,是间接的)俄罗斯,俄罗斯甚至正式承认了其中两个国家(阿布哈兹和南奥塞梯-阿拉尼亚),许多作者一直在观察他们的发展。俄罗斯入侵乌克兰后,它们的地缘政治重要性显著增加。不被承认的国家不可能是开放的经济体,即使它们愿意。此外,就后苏联事实上的国家而言,这些国家都是进口成本高、产品竞争力低的欠发达经济体。提交的稿件从小国理论的角度重点讨论了这些结构。根据地理、人口、经济和历史指标,以及抵制重返社会的能力,它们提出了捍卫事实独立和获得更广泛国际承认的理论可能性。小国理论在实践中表明,事实上的国家不能利用“小国”的好处来加强其政治和经济声望,正是因为缺乏国际承认以及大国在地缘政治影响力上的竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Politicke Vedy
Politicke Vedy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信