Tranexamic acid use in breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Alec A. Winder, P. McQuillan, B. Dijkstra
{"title":"Tranexamic acid use in breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Alec A. Winder, P. McQuillan, B. Dijkstra","doi":"10.21037/ABS-20-126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We aimed to determine if tranexamic acid (TXA) is safe to use in breast surgery and does it reduce haematoma and seroma formation. Methods: Only high-quality randomized control trials (RCT’s) were included for the meta-analysis. Databases searched included Embase, Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Mednar and google scholar. RCT’s study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results: Ten studies were identified, 5 RCT’s and 5 non-RCT’s. Overall the risk of thromboembolic events was not significantly greater after TXA administration (P=0.35) in 2,283 patients from 8 studies. 4 RCT’s were included in the meta-analysis. For mastectomy patients with or without axillary surgery combined with mammoplasty procedures the rate of haematoma was unaffected [odds ratio (OR) =0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19 to 0.76, P=0.30]. A small reduction in drainage volumes first 24 hours was observed [mean difference (MD) =−12 mL, 95% CI: −20.7 to −3.7, P=0.005], but no effect on late seroma formation (OR =1.04, 95% CI: 0.37 to 2.91, P=0.94). Conclusions: The overall quantity and quality of evidence for TXA use in breast surgery is extremely limited. The current study suggests there is likely to be minimal benefit, at least for mastectomy and mammoplasty patients, with a still undefined risk of thromboembolic events. No RCT’s were identified examining TXA use in breast reconstruction. then compared to","PeriodicalId":72212,"journal":{"name":"Annals of breast surgery : an open access journal to bridge breast surgeons across the world","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of breast surgery : an open access journal to bridge breast surgeons across the world","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ABS-20-126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: We aimed to determine if tranexamic acid (TXA) is safe to use in breast surgery and does it reduce haematoma and seroma formation. Methods: Only high-quality randomized control trials (RCT’s) were included for the meta-analysis. Databases searched included Embase, Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Mednar and google scholar. RCT’s study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results: Ten studies were identified, 5 RCT’s and 5 non-RCT’s. Overall the risk of thromboembolic events was not significantly greater after TXA administration (P=0.35) in 2,283 patients from 8 studies. 4 RCT’s were included in the meta-analysis. For mastectomy patients with or without axillary surgery combined with mammoplasty procedures the rate of haematoma was unaffected [odds ratio (OR) =0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19 to 0.76, P=0.30]. A small reduction in drainage volumes first 24 hours was observed [mean difference (MD) =−12 mL, 95% CI: −20.7 to −3.7, P=0.005], but no effect on late seroma formation (OR =1.04, 95% CI: 0.37 to 2.91, P=0.94). Conclusions: The overall quantity and quality of evidence for TXA use in breast surgery is extremely limited. The current study suggests there is likely to be minimal benefit, at least for mastectomy and mammoplasty patients, with a still undefined risk of thromboembolic events. No RCT’s were identified examining TXA use in breast reconstruction. then compared to
氨甲环酸在乳腺手术中的应用:系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:我们的目的是确定氨甲环酸(TXA)在乳腺手术中使用是否安全,以及它是否能减少血肿和血清瘤的形成。方法:仅纳入高质量随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析。搜索的数据库包括Embase、Medline、Cochrane对照试验中央登记处、Mednar和谷歌学者。RCT的研究质量使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行评估。结果:确定了10项研究,其中5项为随机对照试验,5项为非随机对照试验。总的来说,在8项研究的2283名患者中,TXA给药后发生血栓栓塞事件的风险没有显著增加(P=0.35)。荟萃分析包括4项随机对照试验。对于有或没有腋窝手术和乳房成形术的乳房切除术患者,血肿发生率不受影响[比值比(or)=0.42,95%置信区间(CI):0.19至0.76,P=0.030]。观察到前24小时的引流量略有减少[平均差(MD)=−12 mL,95%可信区间:−20.7至−3.7,P=0.005],但对晚期血清瘤形成没有影响(OR=1.04,95%CI:0.37-2.91,P=0.94)。结论:TXA在乳腺手术中使用的总体证据数量和质量非常有限。目前的研究表明,至少对乳房切除术和乳房成形术患者来说,益处可能微乎其微,血栓栓塞事件的风险仍不明确。在检查TXA在乳房重建中的应用时,没有发现随机对照试验。然后与
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信