R. Conrey, D. G. Bailey, J. Singer, L. Wagoner, B. Parfitt, J. Hay, O. Keh, Z. Chang, S. Huang
{"title":"Combined use of multiple external and internal standards in LA-ICP-MS analysis of bulk geological samples using lithium borate fused glass","authors":"R. Conrey, D. G. Bailey, J. Singer, L. Wagoner, B. Parfitt, J. Hay, O. Keh, Z. Chang, S. Huang","doi":"10.1144/geochem2023-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We describe a method for LA-ICP-MS elemental analysis of geological materials using low-dilution Li-borate fused glass WDXRF pellets, with samples, drift monitor, and 18 reference materials (RMs) identically prepared. After analysis for 46 elements by WDXRF, LA-ICP-MS intensities from samples and RMs are collected, and background corrected with\n Iolite\n software.\n HALite\n , a new software application, was developed to derive the elemental compositions from the LA-ICP-MS net signals. In\n HALite\n , elements are drift corrected using polynomial functions, and flux-fused RM element sensitivities are calculated from known mass fractions. Multiple internal standard (IS) elements are used to model each sample's laser response. Analyte mass fractions in unknowns are determined using the calibrated sensitivity correlation models for multiple IS elements. Either the WDXRF mass fractions or the initial round of calculated LA-ICP-MS mass fractions are used to calculate weighted mean sensitivities. Validation experiments with flux-fused RMs run as unknowns yield results with less than 5-10% total relative uncertainty for most analytes. We derive equations which allow calculation of the precision and total uncertainty as a function of mass fraction for each analyte element.\n \n \n Supplementary materials:\n Table 1 - RMs used; Table 2 - Operating parameters; Table 3 - Model vs. accepted mass fractions; Table 4 - NIST 610 vs. multiple IS models; Table 5 - Fitting parameters; Appendix 1 - HALite description; Appendix A - Summary calibration graphs; Appendix B - Validation results; Appendix C - WDXRF comparisons; Appendix D - Repeatability uncertainties; Appendix E - RM uncertainties; Appendix F - Total uncertainties for this article are available at\n https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6639885\n","PeriodicalId":55114,"journal":{"name":"Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochemistry-Exploration Environment Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/geochem2023-001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
We describe a method for LA-ICP-MS elemental analysis of geological materials using low-dilution Li-borate fused glass WDXRF pellets, with samples, drift monitor, and 18 reference materials (RMs) identically prepared. After analysis for 46 elements by WDXRF, LA-ICP-MS intensities from samples and RMs are collected, and background corrected with
Iolite
software.
HALite
, a new software application, was developed to derive the elemental compositions from the LA-ICP-MS net signals. In
HALite
, elements are drift corrected using polynomial functions, and flux-fused RM element sensitivities are calculated from known mass fractions. Multiple internal standard (IS) elements are used to model each sample's laser response. Analyte mass fractions in unknowns are determined using the calibrated sensitivity correlation models for multiple IS elements. Either the WDXRF mass fractions or the initial round of calculated LA-ICP-MS mass fractions are used to calculate weighted mean sensitivities. Validation experiments with flux-fused RMs run as unknowns yield results with less than 5-10% total relative uncertainty for most analytes. We derive equations which allow calculation of the precision and total uncertainty as a function of mass fraction for each analyte element.
Supplementary materials:
Table 1 - RMs used; Table 2 - Operating parameters; Table 3 - Model vs. accepted mass fractions; Table 4 - NIST 610 vs. multiple IS models; Table 5 - Fitting parameters; Appendix 1 - HALite description; Appendix A - Summary calibration graphs; Appendix B - Validation results; Appendix C - WDXRF comparisons; Appendix D - Repeatability uncertainties; Appendix E - RM uncertainties; Appendix F - Total uncertainties for this article are available at
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6639885
期刊介绍:
Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis (GEEA) is a co-owned journal of the Geological Society of London and the Association of Applied Geochemists (AAG).
GEEA focuses on mineral exploration using geochemistry; related fields also covered include geoanalysis, the development of methods and techniques used to analyse geochemical materials such as rocks, soils, sediments, waters and vegetation, and environmental issues associated with mining and source apportionment.
GEEA is well-known for its thematic sets on hot topics and regularly publishes papers from the biennial International Applied Geochemistry Symposium (IAGS).
Papers that seek to integrate geological, geochemical and geophysical methods of exploration are particularly welcome, as are those that concern geochemical mapping and those that comprise case histories. Given the many links between exploration and environmental geochemistry, the journal encourages the exchange of concepts and data; in particular, to differentiate various sources of elements.
GEEA publishes research articles; discussion papers; book reviews; editorial content and thematic sets.