Failure to respond to a coral disease epizootic in Florida: causes and consequences

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
W. Precht
{"title":"Failure to respond to a coral disease epizootic in Florida: causes and consequences","authors":"W. Precht","doi":"10.3897/RETHINKINGECOLOGY.6.56285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD) was first observed in September 2014 near Virginia Key, Florida. In roughly six years, the disease spread throughout Florida and into the greater Caribbean basin. The high prevalence of SCTLD and high resulting mortality in coral populations, and the large number of susceptible species affected, suggest that this outbreak is one of the most lethal ever recorded. The initial recognition and management response to this catastrophic disease in Florida was slow, which delayed the start of monitoring programs and prevented coordinated research programs by at least two years. The slow management response was a result of several factors that operated concurrently.\n First, the Port Miami dredging project was ongoing during the coral disease epidemic and dredging rather than SCTLD was blamed by some managers and local environmental groups for the extreme coral losses reported in the project’s compliance monitoring program. Second, this blame was amplified in the media because dredging projects are intuitively assumed to be bad for coral reefs. Third, during this same time State of Florida policy prohibited government employees to acknowledge global warming in their work. This was problematic because ocean warming is a proximal cause of many coral diseases. As a result, the well-known links between warming and coral disease were ignored. A consequence of this policy was that the dredging project provided an easy target to blame for the coral mortality noted in the monitoring program, despite convincing data that suggested otherwise.\n Specifically, results from the intensive compliance monitoring program, conducted by trained scientific divers, were clear. SCTLD that was killing massive numbers of corals throughout Florida was also killing corals at the dredge site – and in the same proportions and among the same suite of species. While eradication of the disease was never a possibility, early control measures may have slowed its spread or allowed for the rescue of significant numbers of large colonies of iconic species. This coral disease outbreak has similarities to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States and there are lessons learned from both that will improve disease response outcomes in the future, to the benefit of coral reefs and human populations.","PeriodicalId":36503,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/RETHINKINGECOLOGY.6.56285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD) was first observed in September 2014 near Virginia Key, Florida. In roughly six years, the disease spread throughout Florida and into the greater Caribbean basin. The high prevalence of SCTLD and high resulting mortality in coral populations, and the large number of susceptible species affected, suggest that this outbreak is one of the most lethal ever recorded. The initial recognition and management response to this catastrophic disease in Florida was slow, which delayed the start of monitoring programs and prevented coordinated research programs by at least two years. The slow management response was a result of several factors that operated concurrently. First, the Port Miami dredging project was ongoing during the coral disease epidemic and dredging rather than SCTLD was blamed by some managers and local environmental groups for the extreme coral losses reported in the project’s compliance monitoring program. Second, this blame was amplified in the media because dredging projects are intuitively assumed to be bad for coral reefs. Third, during this same time State of Florida policy prohibited government employees to acknowledge global warming in their work. This was problematic because ocean warming is a proximal cause of many coral diseases. As a result, the well-known links between warming and coral disease were ignored. A consequence of this policy was that the dredging project provided an easy target to blame for the coral mortality noted in the monitoring program, despite convincing data that suggested otherwise. Specifically, results from the intensive compliance monitoring program, conducted by trained scientific divers, were clear. SCTLD that was killing massive numbers of corals throughout Florida was also killing corals at the dredge site – and in the same proportions and among the same suite of species. While eradication of the disease was never a possibility, early control measures may have slowed its spread or allowed for the rescue of significant numbers of large colonies of iconic species. This coral disease outbreak has similarities to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States and there are lessons learned from both that will improve disease response outcomes in the future, to the benefit of coral reefs and human populations.
未能应对佛罗里达州的珊瑚病流行病:原因和后果
石珊瑚组织损失病(SCTLD)于2014年9月在佛罗里达州弗吉尼亚基附近首次被发现。在大约六年的时间里,这种疾病在整个佛罗里达州蔓延,并蔓延到大加勒比盆地。SCTLD在珊瑚种群中的高流行率和由此导致的高死亡率,以及受影响的大量易感物种,表明此次疫情是有记录以来最致命的疫情之一。佛罗里达州对这种灾难性疾病的最初认识和管理反应缓慢,这推迟了监测项目的启动,并使协调的研究项目推迟了至少两年。管理层反应迟缓是多种因素同时作用的结果。首先,迈阿密港疏浚项目在珊瑚病流行期间正在进行,一些管理人员和当地环保组织指责疏浚而不是SCTLD造成了该项目合规监测计划中报告的极端珊瑚损失。其次,这种指责在媒体上被放大了,因为人们直观地认为疏浚项目对珊瑚礁不利。第三,在此期间,佛罗里达州的政策禁止政府雇员在工作中承认全球变暖。这是有问题的,因为海洋变暖是许多珊瑚疾病的近端原因。因此,众所周知的气候变暖与珊瑚疾病之间的联系被忽视了。这项政策的结果是,尽管有令人信服的数据表明情况并非如此,但疏浚项目很容易成为监测计划中珊瑚死亡的罪魁祸首。具体来说,由训练有素的科学潜水员进行的强化合规监测计划的结果是明确的。SCTLD在佛罗里达州各地杀死了大量珊瑚,也在疏浚现场杀死了珊瑚——而且在同一物种群中以相同的比例杀死了珊瑚。虽然根除这种疾病从来都不可能,但早期的控制措施可能减缓了它的传播,或者允许拯救大量的标志性物种。这次珊瑚病的爆发与美国的新冠肺炎大流行相似,从中吸取的教训将改善未来的疾病应对结果,造福珊瑚礁和人类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rethinking Ecology
Rethinking Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信