Understanding “Foreign Enterprise Investors” in Chinese Laws: A Suggested Standard for Identification

WU Guanzheng
{"title":"Understanding “Foreign Enterprise Investors” in Chinese Laws: A Suggested Standard for Identification","authors":"WU Guanzheng","doi":"10.17265/1548-6605/2021.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying foreign investors is a precondition for the application of the Foreign Investment Law of the People’s Republic of China, but this law does not specify the standard for such an identification. At present, there is no uniform standard or practice in international society. The existing standards for identifying foreign investors in modern countries are the place of incorporation standard, the place of domicile standard, the actual control standard, and the compound standard. The major difference underlying these changing standards is how to confirm the actual connection between foreign investors and host countries. In the era of globalization, multinational enterprises gradually weaken their national identity, becoming closer and more consistent with the interests of domicile. Therefore, the place of domicile standard can best reflect the actual connection between investors and the country, and this standard also gives consideration to the stability and flexibility of the law. As a result, the place of domicile standard has gradually become the main standard by which many countries identify foreign investors. The identification standard of foreign investors in Chinese legislation and international investment treaties is quite confusing, but there is little doubt that the main standard is the place of incorporation standard, which leads to many problems in practice. In order to adapt to the situation of international investment, China should take the implementation of the Foreign Investment Law as an opportunity to unify domestic legislation with the place of domicile standard. At the same time, it should pay closer attention to the convergence of domestic law and international law to achieve its legislative purpose by expanding opening-up and promoting foreign investment.","PeriodicalId":57290,"journal":{"name":"美中法律评论:英文版","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"美中法律评论:英文版","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6605/2021.01.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying foreign investors is a precondition for the application of the Foreign Investment Law of the People’s Republic of China, but this law does not specify the standard for such an identification. At present, there is no uniform standard or practice in international society. The existing standards for identifying foreign investors in modern countries are the place of incorporation standard, the place of domicile standard, the actual control standard, and the compound standard. The major difference underlying these changing standards is how to confirm the actual connection between foreign investors and host countries. In the era of globalization, multinational enterprises gradually weaken their national identity, becoming closer and more consistent with the interests of domicile. Therefore, the place of domicile standard can best reflect the actual connection between investors and the country, and this standard also gives consideration to the stability and flexibility of the law. As a result, the place of domicile standard has gradually become the main standard by which many countries identify foreign investors. The identification standard of foreign investors in Chinese legislation and international investment treaties is quite confusing, but there is little doubt that the main standard is the place of incorporation standard, which leads to many problems in practice. In order to adapt to the situation of international investment, China should take the implementation of the Foreign Investment Law as an opportunity to unify domestic legislation with the place of domicile standard. At the same time, it should pay closer attention to the convergence of domestic law and international law to achieve its legislative purpose by expanding opening-up and promoting foreign investment.
理解中国法律中的“外国企业投资者”:一个建议的认定标准
识别外国投资者是适用《中华人民共和国外商投资法》的前提条件,但该法没有规定识别外国投资者的标准。目前,国际社会没有统一的标准或做法。现代国家现有的外国投资者认定标准有设立地标准、住所地标准、实际控制权标准和复合标准。这些不断变化的标准背后的主要区别在于如何确认外国投资者与东道国之间的实际联系。在全球化时代,跨国企业的民族认同感逐渐弱化,与所在地的利益越来越紧密、一致。因此,住所地标准最能反映投资者与国家的实际联系,这一标准也兼顾了法律的稳定性和灵活性。因此,住所地标准逐渐成为许多国家识别外国投资者的主要标准。中国立法和国际投资条约中对外国投资者的认定标准相当混乱,但毫无疑问,主要标准是设立地标准,这导致了实践中的许多问题。为适应国际投资形势,中国应以《外商投资法》的实施为契机,将国内立法与住所地标准统一起来。同时,它应更加关注国内法和国际法的衔接,以通过扩大开放和促进外国投资来实现其立法目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
609
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书