Firesetting among 18-23 year old un-apprehended adults: a UK community study

IF 0.5 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Emma R. Barrowcliffe, Nichola Tyler, Theresa A. Gannon
{"title":"Firesetting among 18-23 year old un-apprehended adults: a UK community study","authors":"Emma R. Barrowcliffe, Nichola Tyler, Theresa A. Gannon","doi":"10.1108/JCRPP-06-2021-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to assess the prevalence of firesetting in a sample of young UK adults aged 18 to 23 years and to compare their characteristics with non-firesetting individuals.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTwo-hundred and forty male (n = 119, 49.6%) and female (n = 121, 50.4%) participants were recruited through Prolific Academic. Comparisons were made between self-reported firesetting and non-firesetting participants on a range of demographic, fire-related and personality measures. Factors predictive of firesetting status were examined using hierarchical logistic regression.\n\n\nFindings\nTwenty-five percent of participants (n = 60) reported igniting a deliberate fire. Logistic regression was used to examine the ability of parental supervision and behavioural issues (e.g., witnessing domestic violence, experimenting with fire before age 10 and family history of firesetting), antisocial behaviours (e.g., having criminal friends, impulsivity, teenage access to fire paraphernalia, skipping class more than once per week, taken any illegal drugs and participation in criminal behaviour) and fire-related interests, attitudes and propensities in predicting firesetting status. Factors found to distinguish firesetting and non-firesetting participants included the following: experimented with fire before 10 years of age, family history of firesetting, impulsivity, teenage access to fire paraphernalia, participation in criminal behaviour and the Fire Setting Scale.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe results provide key information about potential risk factors relating to un-apprehended firesetting in the general population.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research adds to the small body of literature examining firesetting in the general population. It refines previously used methodologies, presents the first research study to examine the prevalence of firesetting behaviour in emerging adults and enhances our understanding of un-apprehended firesetting.\n","PeriodicalId":43553,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-06-2021-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to assess the prevalence of firesetting in a sample of young UK adults aged 18 to 23 years and to compare their characteristics with non-firesetting individuals. Design/methodology/approach Two-hundred and forty male (n = 119, 49.6%) and female (n = 121, 50.4%) participants were recruited through Prolific Academic. Comparisons were made between self-reported firesetting and non-firesetting participants on a range of demographic, fire-related and personality measures. Factors predictive of firesetting status were examined using hierarchical logistic regression. Findings Twenty-five percent of participants (n = 60) reported igniting a deliberate fire. Logistic regression was used to examine the ability of parental supervision and behavioural issues (e.g., witnessing domestic violence, experimenting with fire before age 10 and family history of firesetting), antisocial behaviours (e.g., having criminal friends, impulsivity, teenage access to fire paraphernalia, skipping class more than once per week, taken any illegal drugs and participation in criminal behaviour) and fire-related interests, attitudes and propensities in predicting firesetting status. Factors found to distinguish firesetting and non-firesetting participants included the following: experimented with fire before 10 years of age, family history of firesetting, impulsivity, teenage access to fire paraphernalia, participation in criminal behaviour and the Fire Setting Scale. Practical implications The results provide key information about potential risk factors relating to un-apprehended firesetting in the general population. Originality/value This research adds to the small body of literature examining firesetting in the general population. It refines previously used methodologies, presents the first research study to examine the prevalence of firesetting behaviour in emerging adults and enhances our understanding of un-apprehended firesetting.
18-23岁未被捕成年人的火灾:一项英国社区研究
目的本研究旨在评估英国18至23岁年轻成年人的纵火流行率 年,并将其特征与非纵火个体进行比较。设计/方法/方法通过Prolific Academic招募了240名男性(n=119,49.6%)和女性(n=121,50.4%)参与者。在一系列人口统计学、火灾相关和个性测量方面,对自我报告的火灾和非火灾参与者进行了比较。采用层次逻辑回归法对火灾状态的预测因素进行了检验。调查结果百分之二十五的参与者(n=60)报告说他们故意点火。Logistic回归用于检验父母的监督能力和行为问题(例如,目睹家庭暴力、10岁前尝试火灾和家庭纵火史),反社会行为(例如,有犯罪朋友、冲动、青少年使用消防用具、每周逃课一次以上、服用任何非法药物和参与犯罪行为)以及与火灾相关的兴趣、态度和预测火灾状况的倾向。发现区分纵火和非纵火参与者的因素包括:在10岁之前进行火灾实验 年龄、家庭纵火史、冲动、青少年使用消防用具、参与犯罪行为和纵火量表。实际含义。研究结果提供了有关普通人群中未逮捕纵火的潜在风险因素的关键信息。独创性/价值这项研究增加了对普通人群中纵火的少量文献。它改进了以前使用的方法,提出了第一项研究新兴成年人纵火行为的普遍性,并增强了我们对未意识到的纵火的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信