The “Turn” Turn

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
C. Rojas
{"title":"The “Turn” Turn","authors":"C. Rojas","doi":"10.1353/dia.2019.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Excerpt:In this special issue, we focus on academic equivalents of the Wuhan lockdown and the George Floyd protests. That is to say, we examine moments when multiple intersecting factors have generated a crucial inflection point within scholarly discourse, resulting in a series of methodological and conceptual shifts capable of impacting work across a variety of different disciplines. These sorts of shifts are often referred to as “turns,” with the word turn being a trope (which, of course, literally means “turn”) that carries two sets of mutually opposed connotations—suggesting both a discrete shift within an existing trajectory as well as a fundamental redirection, such as a U-turn. In fact, both sets of connotations apply to the phenomenon of the scholarly turn. Just as the Wuhan lockdown and the George Floyd protests were each the result of a gradual accumulation of earlier developments that eventually came to pose a more fundamental challenge to the existing status quo, scholarly turns are similarly the product of a long series of incremental intellectual and sociocultural developments but ultimately come to be regarded as fundamental paradigm shifts and methodological realignments.","PeriodicalId":46840,"journal":{"name":"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/dia.2019.0031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2019.0031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Excerpt:In this special issue, we focus on academic equivalents of the Wuhan lockdown and the George Floyd protests. That is to say, we examine moments when multiple intersecting factors have generated a crucial inflection point within scholarly discourse, resulting in a series of methodological and conceptual shifts capable of impacting work across a variety of different disciplines. These sorts of shifts are often referred to as “turns,” with the word turn being a trope (which, of course, literally means “turn”) that carries two sets of mutually opposed connotations—suggesting both a discrete shift within an existing trajectory as well as a fundamental redirection, such as a U-turn. In fact, both sets of connotations apply to the phenomenon of the scholarly turn. Just as the Wuhan lockdown and the George Floyd protests were each the result of a gradual accumulation of earlier developments that eventually came to pose a more fundamental challenge to the existing status quo, scholarly turns are similarly the product of a long series of incremental intellectual and sociocultural developments but ultimately come to be regarded as fundamental paradigm shifts and methodological realignments.
“转弯”
摘录:在本期特刊中,我们将关注武汉封锁和乔治·弗洛伊德抗议活动的学术对等。也就是说,我们研究了多重交叉因素在学术话语中产生关键转折点的时刻,从而导致一系列方法和概念的转变,这些转变能够影响各种不同学科的工作。这类转变通常被称为“转向”,“转向”一词是一个比喻(当然,字面意思是“转向”),带有两组相互对立的含义——既暗示了现有轨迹中的离散转变,也暗示了基本的重定向,如U型转弯。事实上,这两种含义都适用于学术转向现象。正如武汉封锁和乔治·弗洛伊德抗议活动都是早期事态发展逐渐积累的结果,最终对现有现状构成了更根本的挑战一样,学术转向同样是一系列渐进的智力和社会文化发展的产物,但最终被视为基本的范式转变和方法调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM
DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For over thirty years, diacritics has been an exceptional and influential forum for scholars writing on the problems of literary criticism. Each issue features articles in which contributors compare and analyze books on particular theoretical works and develop their own positions on the theses, methods, and theoretical implications of those works.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信