A comparative study of modified Hodge test and Carba NP test for detecting carbapenemase production in Gram-negative bacteria

Q4 Medicine
S. Datta, R. Dey, J. Dey, Srijita Ghosh
{"title":"A comparative study of modified Hodge test and Carba NP test for detecting carbapenemase production in Gram-negative bacteria","authors":"S. Datta, R. Dey, J. Dey, Srijita Ghosh","doi":"10.4103/0975-2870.213930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the modified Hodge test (MHT) and Carba NP test for the detection of carbapenemase production on Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Materials and Methods: A total of 816 well-characterized GNB isolated from various clinical samples received from both out- and hospitalized patients were included in the study. Out of those, 16.18% (132/816) were carbapenem-resistant on screening test. MHT and Carba NP test were carried out on all these carbapenem-resistant GNB isolates. Results: Out of the 132 isolates screened resistant during the study period, 75% (99/132) were positive for MHT and 86.4% (114/132) showed the presence of carbapenemase by Carba NP test. Conclusion: The advantage of the Carba NP test over MHT is that it is a rapid test where the results can be read in short time and it is easy to perform. The number of detected carbapenemase producers was significantly higher by Carba NP test though this finding can only be validated by molecular analysis of the strains.","PeriodicalId":36033,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University","volume":"10 1","pages":"365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-2870.213930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the modified Hodge test (MHT) and Carba NP test for the detection of carbapenemase production on Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Materials and Methods: A total of 816 well-characterized GNB isolated from various clinical samples received from both out- and hospitalized patients were included in the study. Out of those, 16.18% (132/816) were carbapenem-resistant on screening test. MHT and Carba NP test were carried out on all these carbapenem-resistant GNB isolates. Results: Out of the 132 isolates screened resistant during the study period, 75% (99/132) were positive for MHT and 86.4% (114/132) showed the presence of carbapenemase by Carba NP test. Conclusion: The advantage of the Carba NP test over MHT is that it is a rapid test where the results can be read in short time and it is easy to perform. The number of detected carbapenemase producers was significantly higher by Carba NP test though this finding can only be validated by molecular analysis of the strains.
改良Hodge试验和Carba-NP试验检测革兰氏阴性菌产碳青霉烯酶的比较研究
目的:评价改良Hodge试验(MHT)和Carba-NP试验检测革兰氏阴性杆菌(GNB)产碳青霉烯酶的疗效。材料和方法:从门诊和住院患者的各种临床样本中分离出816个特征良好的GNB,纳入研究。其中,16.18%(132/816)在筛选试验中对碳青霉烯具有耐药性。对所有这些碳青霉烯类耐药GNB菌株进行了MHT和Carba-NP试验。结果:在研究期间筛选出的132个耐药菌株中,通过Carba NP试验,75%(99/132)的MHT阳性,86.4%(114/132)显示存在碳青霉烯酶。结论:与MHT相比,Carba NP测试的优点在于它是一种快速的测试,可以在短时间内读取结果,并且易于执行。Carba NP试验检测到的碳青霉烯酶产生者的数量明显更高,尽管这一发现只能通过菌株的分子分析来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信