The limits of control: corporate ownership and control of German joint-stock firms, 1869–1945

IF 0.4 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
Sibylle Lehmann-Hasemeyer, A. Neumayer
{"title":"The limits of control: corporate ownership and control of German joint-stock firms, 1869–1945","authors":"Sibylle Lehmann-Hasemeyer, A. Neumayer","doi":"10.1017/S0968565022000075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the social structure of ownership of German joint-stock firms covering the period 1869 to 1945 based on a random sample of attendance lists of general meetings. We confirm previous research findings based on smaller samples that despite several changes in the economic and political environment, the majority of shares of the attendees of the general meetings remained firmly in the hands of a few male and mostly inside investors. Moreover, we closely investigate the socio-economic characteristics of the shareholders. We do occasionally find investors from lower social classes and women, but their share of votes was negligible. Adding to the discussion of whether banks strongly monitored and controlled German industrial firms, we aim to track their impact at the meetings. In about 30 per cent of the meetings, a banker or bank was the most influential shareholder and in more than 50 per cent of the meetings a banker or bank was among the three largest shareholders, remarkably without necessarily owning the shares themselves. Although we cannot evaluate whether the banks used this power to pursue their targets, they certainly were in a position to do so.","PeriodicalId":44063,"journal":{"name":"Financial History Review","volume":"29 1","pages":"152 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0968565022000075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We study the social structure of ownership of German joint-stock firms covering the period 1869 to 1945 based on a random sample of attendance lists of general meetings. We confirm previous research findings based on smaller samples that despite several changes in the economic and political environment, the majority of shares of the attendees of the general meetings remained firmly in the hands of a few male and mostly inside investors. Moreover, we closely investigate the socio-economic characteristics of the shareholders. We do occasionally find investors from lower social classes and women, but their share of votes was negligible. Adding to the discussion of whether banks strongly monitored and controlled German industrial firms, we aim to track their impact at the meetings. In about 30 per cent of the meetings, a banker or bank was the most influential shareholder and in more than 50 per cent of the meetings a banker or bank was among the three largest shareholders, remarkably without necessarily owning the shares themselves. Although we cannot evaluate whether the banks used this power to pursue their targets, they certainly were in a position to do so.
控制权的限制:1869-1945年德国股份公司的公司所有权和控制权
我们基于股东大会出席名单的随机样本,研究了1869年至1945年期间德国股份制企业所有权的社会结构。我们证实了之前基于较小样本的研究结果,即尽管经济和政治环境发生了几次变化,但股东大会与会者的大部分股份仍牢牢掌握在少数男性手中,其中大部分是内部投资者。此外,我们密切调查股东的社会经济特征。我们偶尔会发现来自下层社会和女性的投资者,但他们的选票份额微不足道。除了讨论银行是否对德国工业企业进行了强有力的监督和控制之外,我们还打算在会议上跟踪它们的影响。在大约30%的会议中,银行家或银行是最有影响力的股东,在50%以上的会议中银行家或银行属于三大股东之一,显然不一定自己拥有股份。尽管我们无法评估这些银行是否利用这一权力来追求目标,但它们肯定有能力这样做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Financial History Review
Financial History Review HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Financial History Review is the international forum for all scholars with interests in the development of banking, finance, and monetary matters. Its editors deliberately seek to embrace the broadest approach to publishing research findings within this growing historical specialism. Articles address all aspects of financial and monetary history, including technical and theoretical approaches, those derived from cultural and social perspectives and the interrelations between politics and finance. These presentations of current research are complemented by somewhat shorter pieces, specifically conceived as aids to research. Each issue contains a substantial review section, and every complete volume contains an annual bibliography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信