Comparison between laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in morbid obese patients

IF 0.1 Q4 SURGERY
A. M. Galal, A. Saleem, M. Helmy
{"title":"Comparison between laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in morbid obese patients","authors":"A. M. Galal, A. Saleem, M. Helmy","doi":"10.4103/ejs.ejs_98_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To evaluate the laparoscopic approach advantages for the management of acute appendicitis in morbidly obese patients. Methods A prospective study included all morbidly obese patients who had presented to the emergency department at Sohag University Hospitals and were diagnosed with acute appendicitis between the 1st of June 2022 and the 31st of January 2023. All those patients were invited to participate in the research by randomization. The authors informed patients and their first-degree relatives about both techniques, signed a consent form for participation in the study. The authors categorized them into two groups; laparoscopic approach (group I) and open approach (group II). Comparisons were based on operative time, intraoperative complications, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and time until return to normal daily activities. Results The study enrolled 64 patients: 33 had a laparoscopic appendectomy, and 31 had an open appendectomy. The groups were similar in terms of clinicopathologic characteristics. The operating time was significantly shorter for Group I patients than Group II (Group I, 49.09±16.21 min vs. Group II, 68.03±15.78 min; P value less than 0.05). Regarding the length of hospital stay, twenty-six patients (78.8%) were discharged within the 1st 24 h in the laparoscopic group versus 17 patients (54.8%) in the open group (P value 0.041). The time until return to the routine daily work was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (11.27±2.6 days) than in the open group (17.23±4.8 days) (P value less 0.05). Four postoperative complications were reported in the study population: wound complications (infection, seroma formation), residual abdominal abscess, paralytic ileus, and thromboembolic complications (Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism). Group II had a statistically significant higher complication rate (32.3%) than Group I (9.09%) (P value 0.007). Conclusion Laparoscopic appendectomy had superior clinical outcomes than an open appendectomy in morbidly obese patients. In addition to minimal invasiveness and better cosmetic results, it has a great advantage as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in morbidly obese patients with suspected appendicitis. It is also a safe and feasible approach with a low rate of complications with a well-trained expert surgeon.","PeriodicalId":43393,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":"42 1","pages":"488 - 496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_98_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the laparoscopic approach advantages for the management of acute appendicitis in morbidly obese patients. Methods A prospective study included all morbidly obese patients who had presented to the emergency department at Sohag University Hospitals and were diagnosed with acute appendicitis between the 1st of June 2022 and the 31st of January 2023. All those patients were invited to participate in the research by randomization. The authors informed patients and their first-degree relatives about both techniques, signed a consent form for participation in the study. The authors categorized them into two groups; laparoscopic approach (group I) and open approach (group II). Comparisons were based on operative time, intraoperative complications, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and time until return to normal daily activities. Results The study enrolled 64 patients: 33 had a laparoscopic appendectomy, and 31 had an open appendectomy. The groups were similar in terms of clinicopathologic characteristics. The operating time was significantly shorter for Group I patients than Group II (Group I, 49.09±16.21 min vs. Group II, 68.03±15.78 min; P value less than 0.05). Regarding the length of hospital stay, twenty-six patients (78.8%) were discharged within the 1st 24 h in the laparoscopic group versus 17 patients (54.8%) in the open group (P value 0.041). The time until return to the routine daily work was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (11.27±2.6 days) than in the open group (17.23±4.8 days) (P value less 0.05). Four postoperative complications were reported in the study population: wound complications (infection, seroma formation), residual abdominal abscess, paralytic ileus, and thromboembolic complications (Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism). Group II had a statistically significant higher complication rate (32.3%) than Group I (9.09%) (P value 0.007). Conclusion Laparoscopic appendectomy had superior clinical outcomes than an open appendectomy in morbidly obese patients. In addition to minimal invasiveness and better cosmetic results, it has a great advantage as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in morbidly obese patients with suspected appendicitis. It is also a safe and feasible approach with a low rate of complications with a well-trained expert surgeon.
腹腔镜与开放式阑尾切除术治疗病态肥胖患者的比较
目的评价腹腔镜手术治疗病态肥胖患者急性阑尾炎的优势。方法一项前瞻性研究纳入了2022年6月1日至2023年1月31日期间在索哈格大学医院急诊科就诊并被诊断为急性阑尾炎的所有病态肥胖患者。所有这些患者都被随机邀请参与研究。作者将这两种技术告知了患者及其一级亲属,并签署了参与研究的同意书。作者将他们分为两组;腹腔镜入路(Ⅰ组)和开放入路(Ⅱ组)。比较基于手术时间、术中并发症、住院时间、术后并发症和恢复正常日常活动的时间。结果本研究纳入64例患者:33例采用腹腔镜阑尾切除术,31例采用开放式阑尾切除术。两组在临床病理特征方面相似。I组患者的手术时间明显短于II组(I组,49.09±16.21 与第二组相比,最小值为68.03±15.78 min;P值小于0.05)。关于住院时间,26名患者(78.8%)在第一个24小时内出院 h,而开放组为17名患者(54.8%)(P值0.041)。腹腔镜组恢复日常工作的时间(11.27±2.6天)明显短于开放组(17.23±4.8天)(P小于0.05)。研究人群中报告了四种术后并发症:伤口并发症(感染、血清瘤形成),残余腹部脓肿、麻痹性肠梗阻和血栓栓塞并发症(深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞)。第二组并发症发生率(32.3%)高于第一组(9.09%)(P值0.007),具有统计学意义。除了最小的侵袭性和更好的美容效果外,它作为诊断和治疗疑似阑尾炎的病态肥胖患者的工具还有很大的优势。这也是一种安全可行的方法,并发症发生率低,有训练有素的专业外科医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信