Surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer: expert point of view

A-M Schütz, N. Taumberger, P. Pautier, Joly Florence, G. Ferron, J. Classe, E. Pujade-Lauraine, B. Asselain, F. Lécuru
{"title":"Surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer: expert point of view","authors":"A-M Schütz, N. Taumberger, P. Pautier, Joly Florence, G. Ferron, J. Classe, E. Pujade-Lauraine, B. Asselain, F. Lécuru","doi":"10.21037/GPM-2020-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The initial treatment of ovarian cancer consists of a combined approach of surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Complete resection of the tumor should be aimed for, if not manageable, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking is recommended. Until recently, treatment strategies for the recurrent setting were mainly focusing on systemic therapies. Currently published trials including DESKTOP III, GOG 213 and SOC 1 did randomize patients with first platinum-sensitive recurrence to either surgery, aiming for complete cytoreduction, followed by platinum-based chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. All three trials did report a benefit for the surgery arm in terms of progression free survival (PFS), while two of the studies did also show an improved overall survival (OS), this was not the case in the GOG 213 trial, with better result in terms of OS for the chemotherapy + bevacizumab arm. All the above-mentioned studies confirmed that only interventions leading to complete resection provided a benefit, highlighting the need to carefully select the patients who will be offered surgery. A score can be a useful tool but should not be the only basis of the final decision. Noteworthy, these results were obtained in trained centers. Apart from that, the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and BRCA status of the patient needs to be taken into consideration. In case of an indication for anti-angiogenic treatment in the event of a relapse and if not given initially, surgery is debatable. The role of maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitor alone or in combination is also an alternative.","PeriodicalId":92781,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and pelvic medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and pelvic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/GPM-2020-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The initial treatment of ovarian cancer consists of a combined approach of surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Complete resection of the tumor should be aimed for, if not manageable, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking is recommended. Until recently, treatment strategies for the recurrent setting were mainly focusing on systemic therapies. Currently published trials including DESKTOP III, GOG 213 and SOC 1 did randomize patients with first platinum-sensitive recurrence to either surgery, aiming for complete cytoreduction, followed by platinum-based chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. All three trials did report a benefit for the surgery arm in terms of progression free survival (PFS), while two of the studies did also show an improved overall survival (OS), this was not the case in the GOG 213 trial, with better result in terms of OS for the chemotherapy + bevacizumab arm. All the above-mentioned studies confirmed that only interventions leading to complete resection provided a benefit, highlighting the need to carefully select the patients who will be offered surgery. A score can be a useful tool but should not be the only basis of the final decision. Noteworthy, these results were obtained in trained centers. Apart from that, the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and BRCA status of the patient needs to be taken into consideration. In case of an indication for anti-angiogenic treatment in the event of a relapse and if not given initially, surgery is debatable. The role of maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitor alone or in combination is also an alternative.
癌症复发手术的专家观点
:癌症的初步治疗包括手术和基于铂的化疗的联合方法。肿瘤的完全切除应以新辅助化疗(NAC)为目标,如果无法控制的话,建议先进行新辅助化疗,然后进行间隔性减瘤。直到最近,针对复发环境的治疗策略主要集中在系统治疗上。目前已发表的包括DESKTOP III、GOG 213和SOC 1在内的试验确实将首次铂敏感复发的患者随机分组进行手术,目的是完全减少细胞,然后进行基于铂的化疗或单独化疗。所有三项试验都报告了手术组在无进展生存期(PFS)方面的益处,而其中两项研究也显示了总生存期(OS)的改善,GOG 213试验的情况并非如此,化疗+贝伐单抗组的OS效果更好。上述所有研究都证实,只有导致完全切除的干预措施才能带来益处,强调需要仔细选择将接受手术的患者。分数可以是一个有用的工具,但不应该是最终决定的唯一依据。值得注意的是,这些结果是在经过培训的中心获得的。除此之外,还需要考虑患者的同源重组缺陷(HRD)和BRCA状态。如果在复发的情况下有抗血管生成治疗的指征,如果最初不给药,手术是有争议的。PARP抑制剂单独或联合使用的维持治疗作用也是一种替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信