Challenging the wisdom on preferential proportional representation

IF 0.6 4区社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Journal of Theoretical Politics Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/0951629819892334

Carol Mershon

引用次数: 12

Abstract

The conclusion to the special issue takes stock of both the first and the second generations of research on preferential proportional representation (PR) and electoral personalism. The article uses this appraisal in order to locate this project’s achievements within extant scholarship. It argues that the project not only reevaluates but also challenges the wisdom on preferential PR. In challenging the canon, the project enriches the study of electoral institutions, political parties, legislative politics, comparative politics, and political science more broadly.

查看原文本刊更多论文

挑战优先比例代表制的智慧

特刊的结论总结了第一代和第二代关于优惠比例代表制和选举个人化的研究。本文利用这一评估来定位该项目在现有学术中的成就。它认为，该项目不仅重新评估，而且挑战了优惠PR的智慧。在挑战经典的同时，该项目更广泛地丰富了对选举制度、政党、立法政治、比较政治和政治学的研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Theoretical Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

2.10

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Theoretical Politics is an international journal one of whose principal aims is to foster the development of theory in the study of political processes. It provides a forum for the publication of original papers seeking to make genuinely theoretical contributions to the study of politics. The journal includes rigorous analytical articles on a range of theoretical topics. In particular, it focuses on new theoretical work which is broadly accessible to social scientists and contributes to our understanding of political processes. It also includes original syntheses of recent theoretical developments in diverse fields.