Revisiting social workers in schools (SWIS) – making the case for safeguarding in context and the potential for reach

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
Jennifer Rafter
{"title":"Revisiting social workers in schools (SWIS) – making the case for safeguarding in context and the potential for reach","authors":"Jennifer Rafter","doi":"10.1108/jcs-04-2021-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nRecently, there have been renewed calls to place social workers in schools. Although these are not unchartered waters, contextual understandings of safeguarding have reaffirmed the centrality of schools in the lives of young people and keeping them safe. Yet, schools can only do so much to support young people. Safeguarding practice reviews continue to highlight the shortcomings of contextless assessment. This paper aims to make the case for a broader approach to safeguarding practice by placing social workers in schools.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA scoping review was undertaken to elicit social workers in schools (SWIS) literature from the UK, as well as international examples. Keyword searches revealed a lack of consensus on shared/agreement terminology for SWIS. The literature was organised thematically, as a mechanism to open up the extent, range and nature of research activity in relation to SWIS.\n\n\nFindings\nFindings are presented in three themes: misunderstandings of SWIS – what do they actually do?; micro versus macro interventions; and the concept of reach.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe main implications of this study are to sharpen the focus on the centrality of schools in the lives of children and young people; to expand school-based initiatives as a way to reach young people at risk; to re-centre practice to local, community orientation with an emphasis on early help; and to bring together pockets of good practice and learn from successful partnership models.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nLittle attempt has been made to contemplate the past and present and rethread school-based initiatives. There is an absence of attention afforded to the theoretical foundations of SWIS. This paper identifies a gap in interest from the early iterations of SWIS, with a recent upsurgence in attention.\n","PeriodicalId":45244,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Childrens Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Childrens Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcs-04-2021-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Recently, there have been renewed calls to place social workers in schools. Although these are not unchartered waters, contextual understandings of safeguarding have reaffirmed the centrality of schools in the lives of young people and keeping them safe. Yet, schools can only do so much to support young people. Safeguarding practice reviews continue to highlight the shortcomings of contextless assessment. This paper aims to make the case for a broader approach to safeguarding practice by placing social workers in schools. Design/methodology/approach A scoping review was undertaken to elicit social workers in schools (SWIS) literature from the UK, as well as international examples. Keyword searches revealed a lack of consensus on shared/agreement terminology for SWIS. The literature was organised thematically, as a mechanism to open up the extent, range and nature of research activity in relation to SWIS. Findings Findings are presented in three themes: misunderstandings of SWIS – what do they actually do?; micro versus macro interventions; and the concept of reach. Research limitations/implications The main implications of this study are to sharpen the focus on the centrality of schools in the lives of children and young people; to expand school-based initiatives as a way to reach young people at risk; to re-centre practice to local, community orientation with an emphasis on early help; and to bring together pockets of good practice and learn from successful partnership models. Originality/value Little attempt has been made to contemplate the past and present and rethread school-based initiatives. There is an absence of attention afforded to the theoretical foundations of SWIS. This paper identifies a gap in interest from the early iterations of SWIS, with a recent upsurgence in attention.
重新审视学校中的社会工作者(SWIS)——在背景下提出保护的理由和影响的潜力
目的最近,人们再次呼吁在学校里安置社会工作者。尽管这些都不是未知的领域,但对保护的背景理解重申了学校在年轻人生活中的中心地位,并确保他们的安全。然而,学校在支持年轻人方面只能做这么多。保护做法审查继续强调无背景评估的缺点。本文旨在通过将社会工作者安置在学校来为更广泛的保护实践提供理由。设计/方法/方法进行范围界定审查,以获取英国学校社会工作者(SWIS)文献以及国际实例。关键字搜索显示,对SWIS的共享/协议术语缺乏共识。文献按主题组织,作为一种机制,以开放与SWIS相关的研究活动的范围、范围和性质。调查结果分为三个主题:对SWIS的误解——它们实际上是做什么的?;微观干预与宏观干预;以及可达性的概念。研究局限性/含义本研究的主要含义是进一步关注学校在儿童和年轻人生活中的中心地位;扩大以学校为基础的举措,以此帮助处于危险中的年轻人;将实践重新集中到地方和社区,重点是早期帮助;汇集一些良好做法,并向成功的伙伴关系模式学习。独创性/价值观很少有人试图思考过去和现在,并重新思考基于学校的举措。对SWIS的理论基础缺乏关注。本文从SWIS的早期迭代中发现了一个令人感兴趣的差距,最近引起了人们的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信