“Oh, I thought we’d be different”: A multifocal, interdisciplinary examination of the fidelity/adaptation challenge

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
W. Davis, M. Esposito, Jennifer Brown Urban, M. Linver
{"title":"“Oh, I thought we’d be different”: A multifocal, interdisciplinary examination of the fidelity/adaptation challenge","authors":"W. Davis, M. Esposito, Jennifer Brown Urban, M. Linver","doi":"10.1177/14779714221075829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this instrumental, multisite case study is to examine fidelity, adaptation, and differentiation challenges found at Wood Badge, a nationwide Boy Scouts of America training for adult volunteer leaders. Our iterative analysis of more than 900 pages of fieldnotes and 400 pages of documents revealed facilitators often explicitly taught syllabus content during the trainings. Observers noted 119 minor differentiations across trainings, notably involving facilitator delivery methods and the duration and scheduling of training segments. Facilitators observed 16 adaptations, which appeared to be based on external conditions at trainings or facilitator preferences, and just three instances of differentiation. Our analysis of the trainings surfaced key fidelity/adaptation issues like overadherence, conflicting notions of deviation, and the impact of preparation on fidelity. In addition, we identified factors influencing facilitators’ use of adaptation and differentiation. Recommendations for large-scale trainings are made based on the study’s findings.","PeriodicalId":53962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adult and Continuing Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adult and Continuing Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714221075829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this instrumental, multisite case study is to examine fidelity, adaptation, and differentiation challenges found at Wood Badge, a nationwide Boy Scouts of America training for adult volunteer leaders. Our iterative analysis of more than 900 pages of fieldnotes and 400 pages of documents revealed facilitators often explicitly taught syllabus content during the trainings. Observers noted 119 minor differentiations across trainings, notably involving facilitator delivery methods and the duration and scheduling of training segments. Facilitators observed 16 adaptations, which appeared to be based on external conditions at trainings or facilitator preferences, and just three instances of differentiation. Our analysis of the trainings surfaced key fidelity/adaptation issues like overadherence, conflicting notions of deviation, and the impact of preparation on fidelity. In addition, we identified factors influencing facilitators’ use of adaptation and differentiation. Recommendations for large-scale trainings are made based on the study’s findings.
“哦,我以为我们会有所不同”:对保真度/适应挑战的多焦点、跨学科研究
这项工具性的多站点案例研究的目的是检验Wood Badge的忠诚度、适应性和差异化挑战,Wood Badger是美国一家为成年志愿者领导者提供培训的全国性童子军。我们对900多页的现场笔记和400多页的文件进行了迭代分析,发现辅导员在培训期间经常明确教授教学大纲内容。观察员注意到,培训之间存在119个细微差异,特别是涉及调解人的交付方法以及培训环节的持续时间和安排。促进者观察到16种适应,这些适应似乎是基于培训的外部条件或促进者的偏好,只有三种差异。我们对训练的分析揭示了关键的保真度/适应问题,如过度坚持、偏差的冲突概念以及准备对保真度的影响。此外,我们还确定了影响促进者使用适应和差异化的因素。根据研究结果提出了大规模培训的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Adult and Continuing Education
Journal of Adult and Continuing Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The journal is peer-reviewed and focuses on international and national issues and is aimed at researchers, professionals and practitioners in all sectors. It publishes both research articles and reflections on policy and practice, and offers opportunities for all concerned with post-compulsory education to make contributions to debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信