The relevance of the irrelevant: Attentional distractor-response binding predicts performance in the remote associates task.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
S. Zmigrod, Leor Zmigrod, B. Hommel
{"title":"The relevance of the irrelevant: Attentional distractor-response binding predicts performance in the remote associates task.","authors":"S. Zmigrod, Leor Zmigrod, B. Hommel","doi":"10.1037/ACA0000162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychologists have long thought that an inability to suppress irrelevant information hinders our ability to solve problems. However, most studies have investigated analytical rather than creative problem solving. Here, we examine whether the way in which the brain processes task-irrelevant information affects its ability to solve complex and creative problems. Using well-established paradigms from the attentional-perceptual literature (the event-file binding task) and problem-solving literature (the Remote Associates Test and Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices), we found that greater attentional leakage, as manifest by strong perceptual distractor-response binding, might be beneficial for solving insight-based creative problems but not necessarily for problems that require pattern finding and logic. These results suggest a specific advantage for spreading attention more equally between relevant and irrelevant information in order to creatively ‘think outside of the box’. This delineates a beautiful mapping between the way our sensory systems interact with the external world and our brain’s formation of internal semantic networks that underlie our creative capacities. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)","PeriodicalId":47873,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ACA0000162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Psychologists have long thought that an inability to suppress irrelevant information hinders our ability to solve problems. However, most studies have investigated analytical rather than creative problem solving. Here, we examine whether the way in which the brain processes task-irrelevant information affects its ability to solve complex and creative problems. Using well-established paradigms from the attentional-perceptual literature (the event-file binding task) and problem-solving literature (the Remote Associates Test and Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices), we found that greater attentional leakage, as manifest by strong perceptual distractor-response binding, might be beneficial for solving insight-based creative problems but not necessarily for problems that require pattern finding and logic. These results suggest a specific advantage for spreading attention more equally between relevant and irrelevant information in order to creatively ‘think outside of the box’. This delineates a beautiful mapping between the way our sensory systems interact with the external world and our brain’s formation of internal semantic networks that underlie our creative capacities. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)
无关者的相关性:注意力-干扰物-反应结合预测远程同事任务的表现。
心理学家长期以来一直认为,无法抑制无关信息会阻碍我们解决问题的能力。然而,大多数研究都是研究分析性问题解决,而不是创造性问题解决。在这里,我们研究大脑处理与任务无关的信息的方式是否会影响其解决复杂和创造性问题的能力。使用来自注意力-知觉文献(事件文件绑定任务)和解决问题文献(远程联想测试和Raven的高级渐进矩阵)的公认范式,我们发现更大的注意力泄漏,如强烈的感知-干扰物-反应绑定所示,可能有利于解决基于洞察力的创造性问题,但不一定适用于需要模式发现和逻辑的问题。这些结果表明,为了创造性地“跳出框框思考”,在相关信息和无关信息之间更平等地分散注意力具有特定优势。这描绘了我们的感官系统与外部世界互动的方式与我们大脑形成的内部语义网络之间的美丽映射,这些语义网络是我们创造力的基础。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信