An elementary proof of Ramanujan's identity for odd zeta values

Sarth Chavan
{"title":"An elementary proof of Ramanujan's identity for odd zeta values","authors":"Sarth Chavan","doi":"10.7153/jca-2022-19-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Riemann zeta function ζ(s) is one of the most important special functions of Mathematics. While the critical strip 0 < R (s) < 1 is undoubtedly the most important region in the complex plane on account of the unsolved problem regarding location of non-trivial zeros of ζ(s), namely, the Riemann Hypothesis, the right-half plane R (s) > 1 also has its own share of interesting unsolved problems to contribute to. It is quite well known that many number theoretic properties of odd zeta values are nowadays still unsolved mysteries, such as the rationality, transcendence and existence of closed-forms. Only in 1978 did Apéry [2] famously proved that ζ(3) is irrational. This was later reproved in a variety of ways by several authors, in particular Beukers [10] who devised a simple approach involving certain integrals over [0, 1]. In the early 2000s, an important work of Rivoal [21], and Ball and Rivoal [4] determined that infinitely many values of ζ at odd integers are irrational, and the work of Zudilin [27] proved that at least one among ζ(5), ζ(7), ζ(9) and ζ(11) is irrational. A very recent result due to Rivoal and Zudilin [22] states that at least two of the numbers ζ(5), ζ(7), . . . , ζ(69) are irrational. Moreover, for any pair of positive integers a and b, Haynes and Zudilin [17, Theorem 1] have shown that either there are infinitely many m ∈ N for which ζ(am+ b) is irrational, or the sequence {qm} ∞ m=1 of common denominators of the rational elements of the set {ζ(a+ b), . . . , ζ(am+ b)} grows super-exponentially, that is, q 1/m m → ∞ as m → ∞. Despite these advances, to this day no value of ζ(2n+ 1) with n > 2 is known to be irrational. A folklore conjecture states that the numbers π, ζ(3), ζ(5), ζ(7), . . . are algebraically independent over the rationals. This conjecture is predicted by the Grothendieck’s period conjecture for mixed Tate motives. But both conjectures are far out of reach and we do not even know the transcendence of a single odd zeta value. One should mention that Brown [11] has in the past few years outlined a simple geometric approach to understand the structures involved in Beukers’s proof of irrationality of ζ(3) and how this may generalize to other odd zeta values. Ramanujan made many beautiful and elegant discoveries in his short life of 32 years. One of the most remarkable formulas suggested by Ramanujan that has attracted the attention of several mathematicians over the years is the following intriguing identity involving the odd values of the Riemann zeta function [6, 1.2]:","PeriodicalId":73656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of classical analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of classical analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7153/jca-2022-19-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The Riemann zeta function ζ(s) is one of the most important special functions of Mathematics. While the critical strip 0 < R (s) < 1 is undoubtedly the most important region in the complex plane on account of the unsolved problem regarding location of non-trivial zeros of ζ(s), namely, the Riemann Hypothesis, the right-half plane R (s) > 1 also has its own share of interesting unsolved problems to contribute to. It is quite well known that many number theoretic properties of odd zeta values are nowadays still unsolved mysteries, such as the rationality, transcendence and existence of closed-forms. Only in 1978 did Apéry [2] famously proved that ζ(3) is irrational. This was later reproved in a variety of ways by several authors, in particular Beukers [10] who devised a simple approach involving certain integrals over [0, 1]. In the early 2000s, an important work of Rivoal [21], and Ball and Rivoal [4] determined that infinitely many values of ζ at odd integers are irrational, and the work of Zudilin [27] proved that at least one among ζ(5), ζ(7), ζ(9) and ζ(11) is irrational. A very recent result due to Rivoal and Zudilin [22] states that at least two of the numbers ζ(5), ζ(7), . . . , ζ(69) are irrational. Moreover, for any pair of positive integers a and b, Haynes and Zudilin [17, Theorem 1] have shown that either there are infinitely many m ∈ N for which ζ(am+ b) is irrational, or the sequence {qm} ∞ m=1 of common denominators of the rational elements of the set {ζ(a+ b), . . . , ζ(am+ b)} grows super-exponentially, that is, q 1/m m → ∞ as m → ∞. Despite these advances, to this day no value of ζ(2n+ 1) with n > 2 is known to be irrational. A folklore conjecture states that the numbers π, ζ(3), ζ(5), ζ(7), . . . are algebraically independent over the rationals. This conjecture is predicted by the Grothendieck’s period conjecture for mixed Tate motives. But both conjectures are far out of reach and we do not even know the transcendence of a single odd zeta value. One should mention that Brown [11] has in the past few years outlined a simple geometric approach to understand the structures involved in Beukers’s proof of irrationality of ζ(3) and how this may generalize to other odd zeta values. Ramanujan made many beautiful and elegant discoveries in his short life of 32 years. One of the most remarkable formulas suggested by Ramanujan that has attracted the attention of several mathematicians over the years is the following intriguing identity involving the odd values of the Riemann zeta function [6, 1.2]:
Ramanujan奇zeta值恒等式的一个初等证明
黎曼ζ(s)函数是数学中最重要的特殊函数之一。虽然临界带01也有自己的有趣的未解决的问题。众所周知,奇ζ值的许多数论性质至今仍是未解之谜,如封闭形式的合理性、超越性和存在性。直到1978年,Apéry[2]才著名地证明ζ(3)是非理性的。这后来被几位作者以各种方式谴责,特别是Beukers[10],他设计了一种涉及[0,1]上某些积分的简单方法。在21世纪初,Rivoal[21]、Ball和Rivoal[4]的一项重要工作确定了奇整数上ζ的无穷多个值是无理的,Zudilin[27]的工作证明了ζ(5)、ζ(7)、ξ(9)和ζ(11)中至少有一个是无理的。Rivoal和Zudilin[22]最近的一个结果表明,至少有两个数字ζ(5),ζ(7),ζ(69)是不合理的。此外,对于任何一对正整数a和b,Haynes和Zudilin[17,定理1]已经证明,要么有无限多个m∈N,其中ζ(am+b)是无理的,要么集合{ζ(a+b),…,ζ(m+b)}的有理元素的公共分母的序列{qm}∞m=1超指数增长,即q1/m→ ∞ as m→ ∞. 尽管取得了这些进展,但到目前为止,还没有发现n>2的ζ(2n+1)的值是不合理的。一个民间传说推测,数字π,ζ(3),ζ。在代数上独立于有理数。这个猜想是由Grothendieck的泰特混合动机时期猜想预测的。但这两种猜测都遥不可及,我们甚至不知道单个奇ζ值的超越性。值得一提的是,Brown[11]在过去几年中概述了一种简单的几何方法,以理解Beukers证明ζ(3)的非理性所涉及的结构,以及这如何推广到其他奇怪的ζ值。拉马努詹在短短32年的生命中,做出了许多美丽而优雅的发现。Ramanujan提出的最引人注目的公式之一,多年来吸引了几位数学家的注意,是以下涉及黎曼ζ函数奇值的有趣恒等式[6,1.2]:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信