{"title":"Fine structure of Drosophila larval salivary gland ducts as revealed by laser confocal microscopy and SEM","authors":"D. Beňová‐Liszeková, M. Beňo, R. Farkas","doi":"10.14411/EJE.2021.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The functions of the larval salivary glands (SGs) of Drosophila are traditionally associated with the production of a massive secretion during puparium formation; it is exocytosed into a centrally located lumen and subsequently expectorated via ducts, the pharynx and mouth. This so-called proteinaceous glue serves as an adhesive to attach the puparial case to a solid substrate. Great attention has been paid to the secretory cells of SGs, which are famous for their giant polytene chromosomes. However, substantially less attention has been devoted to individual or common ducts that form the most proximal portion of the SG organ via which the glue is released into the pharynx. In the present paper, we describe the organization and fine structure of the taenidia, highly specialized circumferential ring-like extracellular (cuticular) components on the internal side of these tubes. Two chitin-specific probes that have previously been used to recognize taenidia in Drosophila tracheae, Calcofluor White M2R (also known as Fluorescent Brightener 28) and the novel vital fluorescent dye SiR-COOH, show positively stained ductal taenidia in late larval SGs. As seen using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the interior of the ductal tube contains regular and densely-arranged ridge-like circumferential rings which represent local thickenings of the cuticle in various geometries. The microtubular arrays that optically colocalize with taenidia in both the trachea and SG ducts are specifically and strongly recognized by fluorescently-conjugated colchicine as well as anti-tubulin antibody. In contrast to taenidia in the tracheae, the analogous structures in SG ducts cannot be detected by fluorescently-labeled phalloidin or even actin-GFP fusion protein, suggesting that the ducts lack a cortical network made of filamentous actin. We speculate that these taenidia may serve to reinforce the duct during the secretory processes that SGs undergo during late larval and late prepupal stages.","PeriodicalId":11940,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Entomology","volume":"118 1","pages":"123-134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14411/EJE.2021.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The functions of the larval salivary glands (SGs) of Drosophila are traditionally associated with the production of a massive secretion during puparium formation; it is exocytosed into a centrally located lumen and subsequently expectorated via ducts, the pharynx and mouth. This so-called proteinaceous glue serves as an adhesive to attach the puparial case to a solid substrate. Great attention has been paid to the secretory cells of SGs, which are famous for their giant polytene chromosomes. However, substantially less attention has been devoted to individual or common ducts that form the most proximal portion of the SG organ via which the glue is released into the pharynx. In the present paper, we describe the organization and fine structure of the taenidia, highly specialized circumferential ring-like extracellular (cuticular) components on the internal side of these tubes. Two chitin-specific probes that have previously been used to recognize taenidia in Drosophila tracheae, Calcofluor White M2R (also known as Fluorescent Brightener 28) and the novel vital fluorescent dye SiR-COOH, show positively stained ductal taenidia in late larval SGs. As seen using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the interior of the ductal tube contains regular and densely-arranged ridge-like circumferential rings which represent local thickenings of the cuticle in various geometries. The microtubular arrays that optically colocalize with taenidia in both the trachea and SG ducts are specifically and strongly recognized by fluorescently-conjugated colchicine as well as anti-tubulin antibody. In contrast to taenidia in the tracheae, the analogous structures in SG ducts cannot be detected by fluorescently-labeled phalloidin or even actin-GFP fusion protein, suggesting that the ducts lack a cortical network made of filamentous actin. We speculate that these taenidia may serve to reinforce the duct during the secretory processes that SGs undergo during late larval and late prepupal stages.
果蝇幼虫唾液腺(SG)的功能传统上与蛹形成过程中大量分泌有关;它被胞吐到位于中心的管腔中,随后通过导管、咽部和口腔排痰。这种所谓的蛋白质胶可以作为粘合剂将蛹壳附着在固体基质上。SGs的分泌细胞以其巨大的多线染色体而闻名。然而,对形成SG器官最近端部分的单个或常见导管的关注要少得多,通过这些导管将胶水释放到咽部。在本文中,我们描述了带绦虫的组织和精细结构,带绦虫是这些管内侧高度特化的环状细胞外(表皮)成分。两种先前用于识别果蝇气管中带绦虫的几丁质特异性探针,Calcofluor White M2R(也称为荧光增白剂28)和新型重要荧光染料SiR-COOH,在晚期幼虫SG中显示出阳性染色的导管带绦虫。如使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)所见,导管内部包含规则且密集排列的脊状环,其代表不同几何形状的角质层的局部增厚。气管和SG导管中与带绦虫光学共定位的微管阵列被荧光缀合的秋水仙碱和抗微管蛋白抗体特异性且强烈地识别。与气管中的带绦虫不同,SG导管中的类似结构不能通过荧光标记的鬼笔蛋白甚至肌动蛋白-GFP融合蛋白检测到,这表明导管缺乏由丝状肌动蛋白组成的皮层网络。我们推测,在SGs在幼虫后期和前期后期经历的分泌过程中,这些带绦虫可能有助于增强导管。
期刊介绍:
EJE publishes original articles, reviews and points of view on all aspects of entomology. There are no restrictions on geographic region or taxon (Myriapoda, Chelicerata and terrestrial Crustacea included). Comprehensive studies and comparative/experimental approaches are preferred and the following types of manuscripts will usually be declined:
- Descriptive alpha-taxonomic studies unless the paper is markedly comprehensive/revisional taxonomically or regionally, and/or significantly improves our knowledge of comparative morphology, relationships or biogeography of the higher taxon concerned;
- Other purely or predominantly descriptive or enumerative papers [such as (ultra)structural and functional details, life tables, host records, distributional records and faunistic surveys, compiled checklists, etc.] unless they are exceptionally comprehensive or concern data or taxa of particular entomological (e.g., phylogenetic) interest;
- Papers evaluating the effect of chemicals (including pesticides, plant extracts, attractants or repellents, etc.), irradiation, pathogens, or dealing with other data of predominantly agro-economic impact without general entomological relevance.