Comparison of the effects of help-seeking and product-claim direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) and the underlying mechanism

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
I. Darmawan, Hao Xu, J. Huh
{"title":"Comparison of the effects of help-seeking and product-claim direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) and the underlying mechanism","authors":"I. Darmawan, Hao Xu, J. Huh","doi":"10.1108/ijphm-06-2020-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to evaluate the differential effects of help-seeking and product-claim direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) on consumers’ attitude toward the ad, intention to seek information and intention to see a doctor. This paper also seeks to examine the underlying mechanism of these effects and the moderating role of advertising literacy.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAn online experiment was conducted with 130 adults who experienced narcolepsy symptoms and experimental stimuli promoting a fictitious drug for narcolepsy.\n\n\nFindings\nHelp-seeking DTCA generated lower persuasion knowledge activation than product-claim DTCA, resulting in lower skepticism, more favorable attitude toward the ad and higher behavioral intentions. The effects of ad type were stronger among consumers with higher advertising literacy.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis is the first study that provides a thorough examination of the underlying mechanism of the differential effects of help-seeking vs product-claim DTCA as well as the roles of consumers’ advertising literacy on ad outcomes.\n","PeriodicalId":51798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijphm-06-2020-0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the differential effects of help-seeking and product-claim direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) on consumers’ attitude toward the ad, intention to seek information and intention to see a doctor. This paper also seeks to examine the underlying mechanism of these effects and the moderating role of advertising literacy. Design/methodology/approach An online experiment was conducted with 130 adults who experienced narcolepsy symptoms and experimental stimuli promoting a fictitious drug for narcolepsy. Findings Help-seeking DTCA generated lower persuasion knowledge activation than product-claim DTCA, resulting in lower skepticism, more favorable attitude toward the ad and higher behavioral intentions. The effects of ad type were stronger among consumers with higher advertising literacy. Originality/value This is the first study that provides a thorough examination of the underlying mechanism of the differential effects of help-seeking vs product-claim DTCA as well as the roles of consumers’ advertising literacy on ad outcomes.
求助和产品索赔对消费者广告的影响及其潜在机制的比较
目的本研究旨在评估求助和产品索赔直接面向消费者广告(DTCA)对消费者对广告的态度、寻求信息的意愿和就诊意愿的差异影响。本文还试图检验这些影响的潜在机制以及广告素养的调节作用。设计/方法/方法对130名经历发作性睡病症状和实验刺激的成年人进行了一项在线实验,这些刺激促进了一种虚构的治疗发作性睡症的药物。FindingsHelp寻求的DTCA比产品声明的DTCA产生了更低的说服知识激活,导致更低的怀疑,对广告更有利的态度和更高的行为意图。广告类型的影响在广告素养较高的消费者中更强。独创性/价值这是第一项全面研究寻求帮助与产品声明DTCA差异效应的潜在机制,以及消费者的广告素养对广告结果的作用的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信