The international business landscape: a look at paradigms, research gaps and new realities

Caroline Ntara
{"title":"The international business landscape: a look at paradigms, research gaps and new realities","authors":"Caroline Ntara","doi":"10.1108/itpd-05-2022-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse international business (IB) scholarship and present current gaps and new realities to enhance scholarly discourse.Design/methodology/approachThe paper divides the scholarship into three distinct sections. First, it interrogates the changing definitions of the field from the 1880s to date. Secondly, IB paradigms are cross-examined while highlighting the understudied emerging interaction paradigm. Lastly, literature gaps, methodological gaps and new realities in IB are presented.FindingsThis research shows that IB inquiry has concentrated on firm-level paradigms, leaving the emerging interaction paradigm understudied. As a result, there is a deficit of novel ideas and limited research on critical emerging issues affecting IB. Further, simplistic methodologies are prevalent, making IB scholarship weak. Additionally, a majority of studies concentrate on the Americas, Europe and Asia, leaving Africa understudied.Originality/valueThis research augments the need for scholars to cross-examine the best approach to apply in IB discourse and presents gaps calling for new insights and future research directions.","PeriodicalId":34605,"journal":{"name":"International Trade Politics and Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Trade Politics and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/itpd-05-2022-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyse international business (IB) scholarship and present current gaps and new realities to enhance scholarly discourse.Design/methodology/approachThe paper divides the scholarship into three distinct sections. First, it interrogates the changing definitions of the field from the 1880s to date. Secondly, IB paradigms are cross-examined while highlighting the understudied emerging interaction paradigm. Lastly, literature gaps, methodological gaps and new realities in IB are presented.FindingsThis research shows that IB inquiry has concentrated on firm-level paradigms, leaving the emerging interaction paradigm understudied. As a result, there is a deficit of novel ideas and limited research on critical emerging issues affecting IB. Further, simplistic methodologies are prevalent, making IB scholarship weak. Additionally, a majority of studies concentrate on the Americas, Europe and Asia, leaving Africa understudied.Originality/valueThis research augments the need for scholars to cross-examine the best approach to apply in IB discourse and presents gaps calling for new insights and future research directions.
国际商业格局:范式、研究差距和新现实
目的本文旨在分析国际商业(IB)学术,并提出当前的差距和新的现实,以加强学术话语。设计/方法论/方法本文将学术分为三个不同的部分。首先,它询问了从19世纪80年代至今该领域不断变化的定义。其次,IB范式被交叉检验,同时强调了研究不足的新兴互动范式。最后,介绍了IB的文献空白、方法空白和新的现实。发现这项研究表明,IB调查集中在公司层面的范式上,而新兴的互动范式研究不足。因此,缺乏新颖的想法,对影响IB的关键新兴问题的研究有限。此外,简单化的方法论普遍存在,使IB的学术实力较弱。此外,大多数研究集中在美洲、欧洲和亚洲,而非洲研究不足。原创性/价值这项研究增加了学者对IB话语中应用的最佳方法进行交叉研究的必要性,并提出了需要新见解和未来研究方向的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信