Conditional Uniqueness

IF 0.3 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Organon F Pub Date : 2022-05-29 DOI:10.31577/orgf.2022.29205

Erhan Demircioglu

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I aim to do three things. First, I introduce the distinction between the Uniqueness Thesis (U) and what I call the Conditional Uniqueness Thesis (U*). Second, I argue that despite their official advertisements, some prominent uniquers effectively defend U* rather than U. Third, some influential considerations that have been raised by the opponents of U misfire if they are interpreted as against U*. The moral is that an appreciation of the distinction between U and U* helps to clarify the contours of the uniqueness debate and to avoid a good deal of talking past each other.

查看原文本刊更多论文

条件唯一性

在这篇论文中，我的目标是做三件事。首先，我介绍了唯一性命题（U）和我所说的条件惟一性命题（U*）之间的区别。第二，我认为，尽管他们有官方广告，但一些著名的联合会有效地为U而不是U辩护。第三，如果U的反对者被解释为反对U，他们会提出一些有影响力的考虑。寓意是，对U和U*之间的区别的理解有助于澄清独特性辩论的轮廓，并避免大量谈论对方。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Organon F PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

20.00%

发文量

审稿时长

38 weeks

期刊介绍： Organon F publishes high-quality articles on the entire range of topics discussed in contemporary analytic philosophy. Accordingly, we invite authors to submit articles that address issues that belong, but are not limited, to philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, philosophy of science, epistemology, metaphysics and philosophical logic. We also consider analytically written articles on ethics, aesthetics, social philosophy, political philosophy and history of philosophy. The principal aim is to publish original articles that meet the standards typical of analytic philosophy, primarily those of conceptual clarity, precision and soundness of argumentation.