Creep and drying shrinkage behaviour of crumb rubber concrete (CRC)

IF 1.6 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Danda Li, Y. Zhuge, R. Gravina, Tom Benn, J. Mills
{"title":"Creep and drying shrinkage behaviour of crumb rubber concrete (CRC)","authors":"Danda Li, Y. Zhuge, R. Gravina, Tom Benn, J. Mills","doi":"10.1080/14488353.2020.1761510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Creep and drying shrinkage behaviour of CRC was investigated through experimental tests on a series of three stacked cylindrical specimens of 100 mmx200 mm. Constant load was maintained on the specimens for duration of 659 days. For investigation of the influence of the rubber particle treatment method on the CRC creep and shrinkage behaviour, both NaOH-treated and untreated CRC with 18% rubber replacement by volume of sand were considered, with traditional concrete (TC) as a reference mix. Test results of the three mixes were analysed and compared. Creep prediction models and creep coefficients for TC from five standards were considered and comparisons between these models and the experimental results were made. Test results showed that both CRC mixes showed a higher drying shrinkage than TC. NaOH-treatment on rubber particles had a slight positive effect on the long-term shrinkage control of CRC material. The addition of rubber particles to the concrete mix did not affect the concrete creep significantly in the long term. The effect of rubber pre-treatment on creep could be ignored. Both the drying shrinkage and creep coefficient results for all concrete groups were within the limits of AS3600 model.","PeriodicalId":44354,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"18 1","pages":"187 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14488353.2020.1761510","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14488353.2020.1761510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

ABSTRACT Creep and drying shrinkage behaviour of CRC was investigated through experimental tests on a series of three stacked cylindrical specimens of 100 mmx200 mm. Constant load was maintained on the specimens for duration of 659 days. For investigation of the influence of the rubber particle treatment method on the CRC creep and shrinkage behaviour, both NaOH-treated and untreated CRC with 18% rubber replacement by volume of sand were considered, with traditional concrete (TC) as a reference mix. Test results of the three mixes were analysed and compared. Creep prediction models and creep coefficients for TC from five standards were considered and comparisons between these models and the experimental results were made. Test results showed that both CRC mixes showed a higher drying shrinkage than TC. NaOH-treatment on rubber particles had a slight positive effect on the long-term shrinkage control of CRC material. The addition of rubber particles to the concrete mix did not affect the concrete creep significantly in the long term. The effect of rubber pre-treatment on creep could be ignored. Both the drying shrinkage and creep coefficient results for all concrete groups were within the limits of AS3600 model.
橡胶屑混凝土(CRC)的蠕变和干缩性能
摘要通过对一系列100 mmx200 mm的三个堆叠圆柱形试件的实验测试,研究了CRC的蠕变和干缩行为。试件上的恒定载荷保持659天。为了研究橡胶颗粒处理方法对CRC蠕变和收缩行为的影响,考虑了NaOH处理和未处理的CRC,用18%体积的沙子代替橡胶,并将传统混凝土(TC)作为参考混合物。对三种混合料的试验结果进行了分析和比较。考虑了五个标准TC的蠕变预测模型和蠕变系数,并将这些模型与实验结果进行了比较。试验结果表明,两种CRC混合料均表现出比TC更高的干燥收缩率。对橡胶颗粒进行NaOH处理对CRC材料的长期收缩控制有轻微的积极作用。从长远来看,在混凝土混合物中添加橡胶颗粒不会对混凝土蠕变产生显著影响。橡胶预处理对蠕变的影响可以忽略不计。所有混凝土组的干燥收缩和蠕变系数结果均在AS3600模型的限制范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信