Comparative Study of Environmental Disclosure in Indonesia and Malaysia: Testing Company Characteristics

R. Zulfikar
{"title":"Comparative Study of Environmental Disclosure in Indonesia and Malaysia: Testing Company Characteristics","authors":"R. Zulfikar","doi":"10.35448/JRAT.V14I1.10821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two purposes of this study. The first is to compare the environmental disclosure practices in the annual report of Indonesian and Malaysian manufacturing companies. The second is to test the impact of firm characteristics on environmental disclosure, both in Indonesia and Malaysia. Firm characteristics are represented by firm size, profitability, liquidity, firm age, and audit firm size. Under the Slovin’s Formula and purposive sampling method, 82 Indonesian and 167 Malaysian manufacturing companies are selected. Dichotomy approaches are used to measure the dependent variable of environmental disclosure. There are 9 main aspects which include 30 items of environmental according to Sustainable Reporting Guidelines version 3.1. Different proxies consist of the natural logarithm of total assets, return on equity ratio, current ratio, the natural logarithm of firm age, and audit firm size (BIG 4 and Non-Big 4) is used as a measurement of the independent variable of firm characteristics. Comparison and relation in this study tested by analysis of descriptive statistics, t-test, and multiple regression. A score of environmental disclosure both in Indonesia and Malaysia is only 18,33%. The result indicates that the environmental awareness of businessmen in manufacturing companies still low. The result of the t-test shows that there is a difference in environmental disclosure between Indonesia and Malaysia. The multiple regression analysis shows that firm size, audit firm size, and firm age are significant predictors of environmental disclosure both in Indonesia and Malaysia. Profitability and liquidity show no influence on environmental disclosure in both countries.","PeriodicalId":33377,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Terpadu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Terpadu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35448/JRAT.V14I1.10821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are two purposes of this study. The first is to compare the environmental disclosure practices in the annual report of Indonesian and Malaysian manufacturing companies. The second is to test the impact of firm characteristics on environmental disclosure, both in Indonesia and Malaysia. Firm characteristics are represented by firm size, profitability, liquidity, firm age, and audit firm size. Under the Slovin’s Formula and purposive sampling method, 82 Indonesian and 167 Malaysian manufacturing companies are selected. Dichotomy approaches are used to measure the dependent variable of environmental disclosure. There are 9 main aspects which include 30 items of environmental according to Sustainable Reporting Guidelines version 3.1. Different proxies consist of the natural logarithm of total assets, return on equity ratio, current ratio, the natural logarithm of firm age, and audit firm size (BIG 4 and Non-Big 4) is used as a measurement of the independent variable of firm characteristics. Comparison and relation in this study tested by analysis of descriptive statistics, t-test, and multiple regression. A score of environmental disclosure both in Indonesia and Malaysia is only 18,33%. The result indicates that the environmental awareness of businessmen in manufacturing companies still low. The result of the t-test shows that there is a difference in environmental disclosure between Indonesia and Malaysia. The multiple regression analysis shows that firm size, audit firm size, and firm age are significant predictors of environmental disclosure both in Indonesia and Malaysia. Profitability and liquidity show no influence on environmental disclosure in both countries.
印尼和马来西亚环境信息披露比较研究:测试公司特征
这项研究有两个目的。第一是比较印尼和马来西亚制造业公司年度报告中的环境披露做法。第二个是在印度尼西亚和马来西亚测试企业特征对环境披露的影响。公司特征由公司规模、盈利能力、流动性、公司年龄和审计公司规模表示。根据斯洛文公式和有目的的抽样方法,选择了82家印尼和167家马来西亚制造公司。采用二分法来衡量环境披露的因变量。根据《可持续报告准则》3.1版,共有9个主要方面,包括30个环境项目。不同的指标包括总资产的自然对数、净资产收益率、流动比率、公司年龄的自然对数和审计公司规模(BIG 4和非BIG 4),用作衡量公司特征自变量的指标。本研究采用描述性统计、t检验和多元回归分析进行比较和关系检验。印尼和马来西亚的环境披露得分仅为18,33%。结果表明,制造业企业经营者的环保意识仍然较低。t检验结果表明,印尼和马来西亚在环境披露方面存在差异。多元回归分析表明,在印度尼西亚和马来西亚,公司规模、审计公司规模和公司年龄都是环境披露的重要预测因素。在这两个国家,盈利能力和流动性对环境披露没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信