What do they think of me? Professional diversity, meta-stereotype negativity, suspicion, and counterproductive work behaviour

IF 5.4 2区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Rebecca Mitchell, Jun Gu, Brendan Boyle
{"title":"What do they think of me? Professional diversity, meta-stereotype negativity, suspicion, and counterproductive work behaviour","authors":"Rebecca Mitchell,&nbsp;Jun Gu,&nbsp;Brendan Boyle","doi":"10.1111/1748-8583.12476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Relatively little is known about the role of diversity in counterproductive work behaviour (CWB). Drawing on social categorisation theory, we develop and investigate a model of professional diversity on interpersonal CWB through the mediating role of suspicion and examine the role of perceived status differences as an important moderator of this indirect effect. Data from a sample of 63 United States healthcare teams (study 1) and 190 working professionals (study 2) suggest that professional diversity is positively predictive of suspicion within teams and highlights the explanatory role of meta-stereotype negativity. Further, we find that suspicion may mediate the relationship between diversity and CWB, and that perceived status differences between professions moderate the impact of suspicion, and the indirect effect of diversity, on CWB. These results highlight the importance for human resource management leaders to understand the potentially dysfunctional impact of team diversity and the levers available to lessen these negative consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":47916,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management Journal","volume":"32 4","pages":"864-889"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1748-8583.12476","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1748-8583.12476","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Relatively little is known about the role of diversity in counterproductive work behaviour (CWB). Drawing on social categorisation theory, we develop and investigate a model of professional diversity on interpersonal CWB through the mediating role of suspicion and examine the role of perceived status differences as an important moderator of this indirect effect. Data from a sample of 63 United States healthcare teams (study 1) and 190 working professionals (study 2) suggest that professional diversity is positively predictive of suspicion within teams and highlights the explanatory role of meta-stereotype negativity. Further, we find that suspicion may mediate the relationship between diversity and CWB, and that perceived status differences between professions moderate the impact of suspicion, and the indirect effect of diversity, on CWB. These results highlight the importance for human resource management leaders to understand the potentially dysfunctional impact of team diversity and the levers available to lessen these negative consequences.

Abstract Image

他们怎么看我?职业多样性、元刻板印象消极、怀疑和反生产行为
相对而言,我们对多样性在反生产行为(CWB)中的作用知之甚少。利用社会分类理论,我们通过怀疑的中介作用发展和研究了职业多样性对人际绕道的影响模型,并研究了感知地位差异作为这种间接影响的重要调节因素的作用。来自63个美国医疗团队(研究1)和190个工作专业人员(研究2)的样本数据表明,专业多样性对团队内部的怀疑有积极的预测作用,并突出了元刻板印象消极的解释作用。此外,我们发现怀疑可能中介了多样性与CWB之间的关系,而职业之间的感知地位差异调节了怀疑的影响,以及多样性对CWB的间接影响。这些结果强调了人力资源管理领导者了解团队多样性潜在的功能失调影响以及减少这些负面后果的可用杠杆的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.90%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Human Resource Management Journal (CABS/AJG 4*) is a globally orientated HRM journal that promotes the understanding of human resource management to academics and practicing managers. We provide an international forum for discussion and debate, and stress the critical importance of people management to wider economic, political and social concerns. Endorsed by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, HRMJ is essential reading for everyone involved in personnel management, training, industrial relations, employment and human resource management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信