Position Offenses by Notary in Making Authentic Deed : Reviewing the Notary Responsibility

S. R. Lestari, Ichsan Anwary, Mispansyah Mispansyah
{"title":"Position Offenses by Notary in Making Authentic Deed : Reviewing the Notary Responsibility","authors":"S. R. Lestari, Ichsan Anwary, Mispansyah Mispansyah","doi":"10.32801/LAMLAJ.V2I2.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research aims to analyze the notary’ responsibility as common official who conduct contempting of court in making deed and notary’ criminal responsibility in running the deed and criminal liability of Notary in conducting its position. The type of research is normative-legal or also called as doctrinal research. The results of research indicate the form of notary’ responsibility can be administrative, civil or criminal responsibility. Especially the notary’ criminal responsibility is not clearly regulated in the Notary Act, but its responsibility is very dependent on “deliberate” (opzet) in notay’ conduct. In making the deed, the notary shall be responsible for the deeds which are made there or which are intentional mistake, on the contrary if the element of mistake occurs from the parties confronting, so as long as the Notary conducitng ith authority in accordance with the laws and regulations, the Notary concerned cannot be requested accountability, since the Notary simply records what the parties are saying to be contained into a deed","PeriodicalId":31238,"journal":{"name":"Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32801/LAMLAJ.V2I2.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The research aims to analyze the notary’ responsibility as common official who conduct contempting of court in making deed and notary’ criminal responsibility in running the deed and criminal liability of Notary in conducting its position. The type of research is normative-legal or also called as doctrinal research. The results of research indicate the form of notary’ responsibility can be administrative, civil or criminal responsibility. Especially the notary’ criminal responsibility is not clearly regulated in the Notary Act, but its responsibility is very dependent on “deliberate” (opzet) in notay’ conduct. In making the deed, the notary shall be responsible for the deeds which are made there or which are intentional mistake, on the contrary if the element of mistake occurs from the parties confronting, so as long as the Notary conducitng ith authority in accordance with the laws and regulations, the Notary concerned cannot be requested accountability, since the Notary simply records what the parties are saying to be contained into a deed
公证人在公证中的职务犯罪——对公证人责任的再认识
本研究旨在分析公证人作为普通官员在订立契约时藐视法庭的责任,以及公证人在履行契约时的刑事责任和公证人履行职责时的刑事义务。这类研究是规范性的法律研究,也被称为学说研究。研究结果表明,公证人的责任形式可以是行政责任、民事责任或刑事责任。特别是公证人的刑事责任在《公证法》中没有明确规定,但其责任很大程度上取决于公证人行为中的“故意”。在订立契约时,公证人应对在那里所做的契约或故意错误的契约负责,相反,如果错误的因素发生在面对的各方身上,那么只要公证人根据法律法规行使权力,就不能要求相关公证人问责,因为公证人只是将双方所说的内容记录在契约中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信