Maximising Undergraduate Medical Radiation Students’ Learning Experiences Using Cloud-Based Computed Tomography (CT) Software

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Chau, Elio Stefan Arruzza
{"title":"Maximising Undergraduate Medical Radiation Students’ Learning Experiences Using Cloud-Based Computed Tomography (CT) Software","authors":"M. Chau, Elio Stefan Arruzza","doi":"10.1177/10468781231178491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Simulation-based learning is a crucial educational tool for disciplines involving work-integrated learning and clinical practice. Though its uptake is becoming increasingly common in a range of fields, this uptake is less profound in diagnostic radiography and computed tomography. Aim This study explored whether CT simulator software may be a viable option to facilitate the development of practical clinical skills in an effective, safe and supported environment. Methods A cross-sectional mixed methods design was employed. Students in their third year of study undertook formal simulation CT learning using the Siemens SmartSimulator, prior to a six-week off-campus clinical experience. A pre- (n = 42, response rate = 39%) and post-clinical placement Likert scale survey was completed (n = 21, retention rate = 50%), as well as focus group interviews to gather qualitative data (n = 21). Thematic analysis was employed to explore how the simulator developed students’ knowledge of CT concepts and preparedness for clinical placement. Results Survey scores were high, particularly in terms of satisfaction and relevancy. Focus groups drew attention to the software’s capacity to build on foundational principles, prepare students for placement and closely emulate the clinical environment. Students highlighted the need for continual guidance and clinical relevance and maintained that interactive simulation was inferior to real-world clinical placement. Conclusion The integration of CT simulator software has the potential to increase knowledge, confidence, and student preparation for the clinical environment.","PeriodicalId":47521,"journal":{"name":"SIMULATION & GAMING","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIMULATION & GAMING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781231178491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Simulation-based learning is a crucial educational tool for disciplines involving work-integrated learning and clinical practice. Though its uptake is becoming increasingly common in a range of fields, this uptake is less profound in diagnostic radiography and computed tomography. Aim This study explored whether CT simulator software may be a viable option to facilitate the development of practical clinical skills in an effective, safe and supported environment. Methods A cross-sectional mixed methods design was employed. Students in their third year of study undertook formal simulation CT learning using the Siemens SmartSimulator, prior to a six-week off-campus clinical experience. A pre- (n = 42, response rate = 39%) and post-clinical placement Likert scale survey was completed (n = 21, retention rate = 50%), as well as focus group interviews to gather qualitative data (n = 21). Thematic analysis was employed to explore how the simulator developed students’ knowledge of CT concepts and preparedness for clinical placement. Results Survey scores were high, particularly in terms of satisfaction and relevancy. Focus groups drew attention to the software’s capacity to build on foundational principles, prepare students for placement and closely emulate the clinical environment. Students highlighted the need for continual guidance and clinical relevance and maintained that interactive simulation was inferior to real-world clinical placement. Conclusion The integration of CT simulator software has the potential to increase knowledge, confidence, and student preparation for the clinical environment.
使用基于云的计算机断层扫描(CT)软件最大限度地提高医学放射专业本科生的学习体验
背景基于模拟的学习是涉及工作整合学习和临床实践的学科的重要教育工具。尽管它的吸收在一系列领域越来越普遍,但在诊断射线照相和计算机断层摄影中,这种吸收并不那么深刻。目的本研究探讨了CT模拟器软件是否是一种可行的选择,以促进在有效、安全和有支持的环境中发展实用的临床技能。方法采用横断面混合法设计。在为期六周的校外临床体验之前,学习三年级的学生使用西门子SmartSimulator进行了正式的模拟CT学习。完成了临床前(n=42,应答率=39%)和临床后Likert量表调查(n=21,保留率=50%),以及焦点小组访谈,以收集定性数据(n=21)。采用专题分析法探讨模拟器如何培养学生对CT概念的知识和临床安置的准备。结果调查得分较高,尤其是在满意度和相关性方面。焦点小组提请注意该软件在基础原则上的构建能力,为学生的安置做好准备,并密切模仿临床环境。学生们强调了持续指导和临床相关性的必要性,并坚持认为交互式模拟不如真实世界的临床布局。结论CT模拟器软件的集成有可能增加知识、信心和学生对临床环境的准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SIMULATION & GAMING
SIMULATION & GAMING EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal of Theory, Practice and Research contains articles examining academic and applied issues in the expanding fields of simulation, computerized simulation, gaming, modeling, play, role-play, debriefing, game design, experiential learning, and related methodologies. The broad scope and interdisciplinary nature of Simulation & Gaming are demonstrated by the wide variety of interests and disciplines of its readers, contributors, and editorial board members. Areas include: sociology, decision making, psychology, language training, cognition, learning theory, management, educational technologies, negotiation, peace and conflict studies, economics, international studies, research methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信