Implementing Indigenous and Western Knowledge Systems (Part 2): “You Have to Take a Backseat” and Abandon the Arrogance of Expertise

IF 0.8 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
H. Castleden, Debbie Martin, A. Cunsolo, S. Harper, Catherine Hart, Paul Sylvestre, Robert D. Stefanelli, Lindsay Day, Kaitlin J Lauridsen
{"title":"Implementing Indigenous and Western Knowledge Systems (Part 2): “You Have to Take a Backseat” and Abandon the Arrogance of Expertise","authors":"H. Castleden, Debbie Martin, A. Cunsolo, S. Harper, Catherine Hart, Paul Sylvestre, Robert D. Stefanelli, Lindsay Day, Kaitlin J Lauridsen","doi":"10.18584/IIPJ.2017.8.4.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite innovative technological \"solutions\" to address ongoing water crises in Indigenous communities, significant disparities persist in Canada. Financial investment in infrastructure is necessary, but it is hardly sufficient to address the real problem: entrenched colonialism. One of the greatest challenges in decolonizing research is to prevent that research from reproducing the very categories it is seeking to critique and dismantle. We share findings from thematically-analyzed interviews with academic and community-based researchers who conducted water research with a stated intent to implement Western and Indigenous knowledge systems. Findings revealed that while there is co-learning, ontological and epistemological assumptions carried into these relationships often impede truly integrative practice. Respondents shared how they worked through these persistent barriers of a colonial system.","PeriodicalId":13707,"journal":{"name":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","volume":" ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18584/IIPJ.2017.8.4.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Despite innovative technological "solutions" to address ongoing water crises in Indigenous communities, significant disparities persist in Canada. Financial investment in infrastructure is necessary, but it is hardly sufficient to address the real problem: entrenched colonialism. One of the greatest challenges in decolonizing research is to prevent that research from reproducing the very categories it is seeking to critique and dismantle. We share findings from thematically-analyzed interviews with academic and community-based researchers who conducted water research with a stated intent to implement Western and Indigenous knowledge systems. Findings revealed that while there is co-learning, ontological and epistemological assumptions carried into these relationships often impede truly integrative practice. Respondents shared how they worked through these persistent barriers of a colonial system.
实施土著和西方知识体系(下):“你必须后退一步”,放弃对专业知识的傲慢
尽管有创新的技术“解决方案”来解决土著社区持续的水危机,但加拿大仍然存在巨大的差距。对基础设施的财政投资是必要的,但这几乎不足以解决真正的问题:根深蒂固的殖民主义。非殖民化研究的最大挑战之一是防止该研究复制其试图批判和废除的类别。我们分享了对学术和社区研究人员的主题分析访谈结果,这些研究人员进行了水研究,并明确表示有意实施西方和土著知识体系。研究结果表明,虽然存在共同学习,但这些关系中的本体论和认识论假设往往阻碍真正的综合实践。受访者分享了他们是如何克服殖民制度的这些持续障碍的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信