Truth and subjectivity in narrative inquiry: augmented reality and digital storytelling in the university classroom

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Lilia Topouzova
{"title":"Truth and subjectivity in narrative inquiry: augmented reality and digital storytelling in the university classroom","authors":"Lilia Topouzova","doi":"10.1080/1051144X.2021.1902045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In my university classroom teaching, I draw on my interdisciplinary background as both a humanistic scholar and a documentary filmmaker, presenting an approach to learning that integrates scholarship with a digital storytelling practicum. Questions that scrutinize the relationship between written and visual discourses, the possibilities and limits of each, inform both my research and pedagogical practices. Terms such as ‘historiophoty’ (White, 1988) and ‘visionary history’(Rosenstone, 1988) were coined to describe the possibility of the study of history through film and images. The tensions embedded in these pioneering studies continue to animate current research and pedagogical discourses while raising pertinent questions. How can images help us learn about the past? Is it necessary for films to be historically accurate? I consider these questions and expand on anthropologist’s John Jackson Jr’s formulation of “what scholarship entails in our media age.\" I discuss my visual literacy pedagogical trajectory that culminated with a methodology I developed that merges elements of the academic and documentary film worlds, demonstrating the possibilities for interdisciplinary collaboration. This curriculum aims to visualize scholarly research and produce a digital media project that consists of technical and applied learning of the five stages of media production adapted for the university classroom.","PeriodicalId":36535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Literacy","volume":"40 1","pages":"94 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1051144X.2021.1902045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2021.1902045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In my university classroom teaching, I draw on my interdisciplinary background as both a humanistic scholar and a documentary filmmaker, presenting an approach to learning that integrates scholarship with a digital storytelling practicum. Questions that scrutinize the relationship between written and visual discourses, the possibilities and limits of each, inform both my research and pedagogical practices. Terms such as ‘historiophoty’ (White, 1988) and ‘visionary history’(Rosenstone, 1988) were coined to describe the possibility of the study of history through film and images. The tensions embedded in these pioneering studies continue to animate current research and pedagogical discourses while raising pertinent questions. How can images help us learn about the past? Is it necessary for films to be historically accurate? I consider these questions and expand on anthropologist’s John Jackson Jr’s formulation of “what scholarship entails in our media age." I discuss my visual literacy pedagogical trajectory that culminated with a methodology I developed that merges elements of the academic and documentary film worlds, demonstrating the possibilities for interdisciplinary collaboration. This curriculum aims to visualize scholarly research and produce a digital media project that consists of technical and applied learning of the five stages of media production adapted for the university classroom.
叙事探究中的真实性与主观性:大学课堂中的增强现实与数字叙事
摘要在我的大学课堂教学中,我利用我作为人文学者和纪录片制作人的跨学科背景,提出了一种将学术与数字讲故事实践相结合的学习方法。审视书面语篇和视觉语篇之间关系的问题,以及每种可能性和局限性,为我的研究和教学实践提供了信息。诸如“历史性”(White,1988)和“远见卓识的历史”(Rosenstone,1988)等术语是为了描述通过电影和图像研究历史的可能性而创造的。这些开创性研究所蕴含的紧张情绪继续激励着当前的研究和教学话语,同时提出了相关的问题。图像如何帮助我们了解过去?电影有必要保持历史准确性吗?我考虑了这些问题,并扩展了人类学家小约翰·杰克逊关于“在我们的媒体时代,学术需要什么”的提法。“我讨论了我的视觉素养教学轨迹,最终我开发了一种方法,该方法融合了学术和纪录片世界的元素,展示了跨学科合作的可能性。该课程旨在将学术研究可视化,并制作一个数字媒体项目,该项目包括医学五个阶段的技术和应用学习为大学课堂改编的作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Visual Literacy
Journal of Visual Literacy Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信