{"title":"Negation and polar question–answer clauses in South African Sign Language","authors":"Kate Huddlestone","doi":"10.1075/sll.19014.hud","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper contributes to the typological debate of whether sign languages should be divided into manual versus non-manual\n dominant languages, w.r.t. negation, a distinction that has recently been challenged (Johnston\n 2018) or argued to be too radical (Oomen & Pfau 2017), by providing a\n characterization of negation in South African Sign Language (SASL). It has also been observed in several sign languages that a construction\n which consists of a yes-no question followed by a negative fragment answer, both produced by the same speaker, can be used to negate a\n proposition. While this question-answer pair construction has received attention in the recent sign language literature, it is only\n mentioned in passing in the literature on negation. In this paper, I provide an analysis of these polar question-answer clauses as a\n grammaticalized negation strategy in SASL, following Caponigro and Davidson’s (2011) analysis of\n this construction in ASL.","PeriodicalId":43398,"journal":{"name":"Sign Language & Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sign Language & Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19014.hud","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This paper contributes to the typological debate of whether sign languages should be divided into manual versus non-manual
dominant languages, w.r.t. negation, a distinction that has recently been challenged (Johnston
2018) or argued to be too radical (Oomen & Pfau 2017), by providing a
characterization of negation in South African Sign Language (SASL). It has also been observed in several sign languages that a construction
which consists of a yes-no question followed by a negative fragment answer, both produced by the same speaker, can be used to negate a
proposition. While this question-answer pair construction has received attention in the recent sign language literature, it is only
mentioned in passing in the literature on negation. In this paper, I provide an analysis of these polar question-answer clauses as a
grammaticalized negation strategy in SASL, following Caponigro and Davidson’s (2011) analysis of
this construction in ASL.
期刊介绍:
Sign Language & Linguistics is a peer-reviewed, international journal which aims to increase our understanding of language by providing an academic forum for researchers to discuss sign languages in the larger context of natural language, crosslinguistically and crossmodally. SLL presents studies that apply existing theoretical insights to sign language in order to further our understanding of SL; it investigates and expands our knowledge of grammar based on the study of SL and it specifically addresses the effect of modality (signed vs. spoken) on the structure of grammar.