Liturgy’s Ethical Dilemma

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
L. Hoffman
{"title":"Liturgy’s Ethical Dilemma","authors":"L. Hoffman","doi":"10.1080/0458063X.2022.2154553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We should take enormous pride in the liturgical revolution that has characterized the last half century. I count myself blessed to have been born into such a period and to have chanced upon a time and calling that put me in the revolution’s center. Think just of the most obvious signs of ferment we have lived through: the demise of ethnically Catholic or Lutheran or Jewish or even Episcopalian cultures; the very possibility of prayer in the shadow of the Holocaust; the feminist critique of an androcentric liturgy and entire religious cultures that men alone control; the emergence of LGBTQþ from the closet and the realization of gender’s fluidity; the steady advance of secularism and all those Pew reports on millennials and the “nones”; not to mention deconstructionism, postmodernism, postcolonialism, and (by now) everyday ordinary globalism—too many “isms” to count. Among my happiest moments are the many interchanges across faith lines with my Christian liturgical colleagues, as, together, we have defined, faced, or furthered these challenges. Two such moments stand out in my mind as examples of the path we have taken. Together, they illustrate an underlying ethical dilemma that still infects our liturgical project and beckons for our attention if the project is to reach fulfillment.","PeriodicalId":53923,"journal":{"name":"Liturgy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liturgy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0458063X.2022.2154553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We should take enormous pride in the liturgical revolution that has characterized the last half century. I count myself blessed to have been born into such a period and to have chanced upon a time and calling that put me in the revolution’s center. Think just of the most obvious signs of ferment we have lived through: the demise of ethnically Catholic or Lutheran or Jewish or even Episcopalian cultures; the very possibility of prayer in the shadow of the Holocaust; the feminist critique of an androcentric liturgy and entire religious cultures that men alone control; the emergence of LGBTQþ from the closet and the realization of gender’s fluidity; the steady advance of secularism and all those Pew reports on millennials and the “nones”; not to mention deconstructionism, postmodernism, postcolonialism, and (by now) everyday ordinary globalism—too many “isms” to count. Among my happiest moments are the many interchanges across faith lines with my Christian liturgical colleagues, as, together, we have defined, faced, or furthered these challenges. Two such moments stand out in my mind as examples of the path we have taken. Together, they illustrate an underlying ethical dilemma that still infects our liturgical project and beckons for our attention if the project is to reach fulfillment.
Liturgy的伦理困境
我们应该为过去半个世纪以来的礼仪革命感到无比自豪。我觉得自己很幸运出生在这样一个时代,偶然发现了一个将我置于革命中心的时代和使命。想想我们经历过的最明显的骚动迹象:天主教、路德教、犹太甚至圣公会文化的消亡;在大屠杀阴影下祈祷的可能性;女权主义对以男性为中心的礼拜仪式和男性独自控制的整个宗教文化的批判;LGBTQþ从壁橱里出现,并实现了性别的流动性;世俗主义的稳步发展,以及皮尤关于千禧一代和“非主流”的所有报告;更不用说解构主义、后现代主义、后殖民主义和(到目前为止)日常的全球主义了——太多的“主义”无法计数。我最快乐的时刻是与我的基督教礼拜同事们跨越信仰界限进行了多次交流,因为我们共同定义、面对或推进了这些挑战。有两个这样的时刻在我脑海中脱颖而出,成为我们所走道路的例子。它们共同说明了一个潜在的道德困境,这个困境仍然影响着我们的礼拜项目,如果项目要实现,它会吸引我们的注意力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Liturgy
Liturgy RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信