COVID Stress Scales: A Cross-sectional Study of its Psychometric Properties among Africans with Chronic, Stable Medical Conditions

J. Onu, C. B. Nwatu, C. J. Ugwu, N. Mbadiwe, C. Onyeaghala, K. Udeogu, M. Abonyi, E. Young, N. Unaogu, A. Ndukuba, F. Ugwumba, I. Onwuekwe
{"title":"COVID Stress Scales: A Cross-sectional Study of its Psychometric Properties among Africans with Chronic, Stable Medical Conditions","authors":"J. Onu, C. B. Nwatu, C. J. Ugwu, N. Mbadiwe, C. Onyeaghala, K. Udeogu, M. Abonyi, E. Young, N. Unaogu, A. Ndukuba, F. Ugwumba, I. Onwuekwe","doi":"10.9734/indj/2023/v19i4379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The coronavirus 2019 pandemic (COVID-19) elicited in various populations, diverse psycho-behavioral responses. The COVID Stress Scales (CSS) was developed and validated in the general population, among US and Canadian adults, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Expectedly, population-specific variations in response are likely, hence, the need to validate psychometrically sound instruments across cultures and diverse populations. \nAim: To determine the factor structure and reliability estimates of the CSS among participants with chronic, stable medical conditions in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital. \nMethods: The cross-sectional study, involved 1047 consenting adults with chronic, stable medical conditions attending the out-patient specialist clinics of a foremost tertiary hospital in Nigeria. The participants were enrolled consecutively over a four-month period straddling the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. The CSS was administered to participants who fulfilled the study criteria. Exploratory Factor Analyses (EFA) using Principal Component Analysis and Oblimin rotation with Kaiser Normalization, was used to extract the factors.  \nResults: A six-factor structure emerged: COVID-19-related socio-economic consequences; contamination; xenophobia; traumatic stress; compulsive checking and reassurance seeking; and danger. The internal consistency within items of each domain was acceptable (Cronbach alpha 0.85 and above) and correlation between the domains was moderate to strong. \nConclusion: The CSS maintained a six-factor structure, corresponding to the six scales, among Nigerian participants with chronic, stable medical conditions. It has acceptable reliability estimates and can be used to assess COVID-19-related anxiety in this population. The inter-correlation of the various domains is a strong evidence for the existence of COVID stress syndrome.","PeriodicalId":90556,"journal":{"name":"International neuropsychiatric disease journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International neuropsychiatric disease journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/indj/2023/v19i4379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus 2019 pandemic (COVID-19) elicited in various populations, diverse psycho-behavioral responses. The COVID Stress Scales (CSS) was developed and validated in the general population, among US and Canadian adults, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Expectedly, population-specific variations in response are likely, hence, the need to validate psychometrically sound instruments across cultures and diverse populations. Aim: To determine the factor structure and reliability estimates of the CSS among participants with chronic, stable medical conditions in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital. Methods: The cross-sectional study, involved 1047 consenting adults with chronic, stable medical conditions attending the out-patient specialist clinics of a foremost tertiary hospital in Nigeria. The participants were enrolled consecutively over a four-month period straddling the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. The CSS was administered to participants who fulfilled the study criteria. Exploratory Factor Analyses (EFA) using Principal Component Analysis and Oblimin rotation with Kaiser Normalization, was used to extract the factors.  Results: A six-factor structure emerged: COVID-19-related socio-economic consequences; contamination; xenophobia; traumatic stress; compulsive checking and reassurance seeking; and danger. The internal consistency within items of each domain was acceptable (Cronbach alpha 0.85 and above) and correlation between the domains was moderate to strong. Conclusion: The CSS maintained a six-factor structure, corresponding to the six scales, among Nigerian participants with chronic, stable medical conditions. It has acceptable reliability estimates and can be used to assess COVID-19-related anxiety in this population. The inter-correlation of the various domains is a strong evidence for the existence of COVID stress syndrome.
新冠肺炎压力量表:对患有慢性稳定疾病的非洲人心理测量特性的横断面研究
背景:2019冠状病毒大流行(新冠肺炎)在不同人群中引发了不同的心理行为反应。新冠肺炎压力量表(CSS)是在美国和加拿大成年人的普通人群中开发和验证的,以应对新冠肺炎大流行。不出所料,反应可能会因人群而异,因此需要验证不同文化和不同人群的心理测量工具。目的:确定尼日利亚一家三级医院患有慢性、稳定疾病的参与者的CSS的因素结构和可靠性估计。方法:这项横断面研究涉及1047名患有慢性、稳定疾病的成年人,他们在尼日利亚一家最重要的三级医院的门诊专科诊所就诊。参与者在新冠肺炎大流行的第一波和第二波期间连续四个月报名。CSS是对符合研究标准的参与者进行管理的。采用主成分分析和Kaiser归一化的Oblimin旋转的探索性因子分析(EFA)来提取因子。结果:出现了六个因素的结构:与COVID-19相关的社会经济后果;污染仇外心理创伤应激;强制检查和寻求安慰;和危险。每个结构域的项目内部一致性是可接受的(Cronbach alpha 0.85及以上),并且结构域之间的相关性是中等到强烈的。结论:在患有慢性、稳定疾病的尼日利亚参与者中,CSS保持了与六个量表相对应的六因素结构。它具有可接受的可靠性估计,可用于评估该人群中与COVID-19相关的焦虑。不同领域的相互关联是新冠肺炎应激综合征存在的有力证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信