Compliance of good storage practices of pharmacies and medicine outlets: a scoping review

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Carly Ching PhD, Mohammad Ahsan Fuzail BS, Muhammad H. Zaman PhD, Veronika J. Wirtz PhD
{"title":"Compliance of good storage practices of pharmacies and medicine outlets: a scoping review","authors":"Carly Ching PhD,&nbsp;Mohammad Ahsan Fuzail BS,&nbsp;Muhammad H. Zaman PhD,&nbsp;Veronika J. Wirtz PhD","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ensuring good storage practices (GSPs) of medicine outlets is important to maintain and ensure the safety, quality, and efficacy of dispensed medicines. The objective of this scoping review was to determine the most common GSP compliance issues within pharmacies and medicine outlets. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews guidelines were followed, and PubMed and Google Scholar were searched to identify the relevant primary literature from January 2016 and February 2022. All study designs in English were eligible for inclusion as long as they reported quantitative data for the fulfilment of individual GSP activities. Duplicate independent screening of the search results was undertaken. Quality assessment was performed on studies for final inclusion. Data extraction was performed by one reviewer, and the observed aggregate percentage compliance (% compliance), along with 95% confidence interval for the root GSP operation, was calculated. Of the 380 records identified, 15 articles were included. The studies were conducted in 10 countries and the majority were participatory research studies. Fire safety had the lowest aggregate % compliance (0.9%). Controlled substance, climate, light, ventilation and temperature and stock and bookkeeping operations all had overall aggregate % compliance levels below 50%. Despite evidence of basic controls and measures, we identified low compliance for many GSP operations. To ensure the integrity of medicines, it is important to increase the enforcement of security measures, invest resources in personnel training, account for informal vendor practices, and facilitate sharing global data publicly from external and governing body inspections and reviews of storage practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"53 3","pages":"101-109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1854","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ensuring good storage practices (GSPs) of medicine outlets is important to maintain and ensure the safety, quality, and efficacy of dispensed medicines. The objective of this scoping review was to determine the most common GSP compliance issues within pharmacies and medicine outlets. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews guidelines were followed, and PubMed and Google Scholar were searched to identify the relevant primary literature from January 2016 and February 2022. All study designs in English were eligible for inclusion as long as they reported quantitative data for the fulfilment of individual GSP activities. Duplicate independent screening of the search results was undertaken. Quality assessment was performed on studies for final inclusion. Data extraction was performed by one reviewer, and the observed aggregate percentage compliance (% compliance), along with 95% confidence interval for the root GSP operation, was calculated. Of the 380 records identified, 15 articles were included. The studies were conducted in 10 countries and the majority were participatory research studies. Fire safety had the lowest aggregate % compliance (0.9%). Controlled substance, climate, light, ventilation and temperature and stock and bookkeeping operations all had overall aggregate % compliance levels below 50%. Despite evidence of basic controls and measures, we identified low compliance for many GSP operations. To ensure the integrity of medicines, it is important to increase the enforcement of security measures, invest resources in personnel training, account for informal vendor practices, and facilitate sharing global data publicly from external and governing body inspections and reviews of storage practices.

Abstract Image

药店和药店良好储存做法的合规性:范围界定审查
确保药品销售点的良好储存规范对于维护和确保配药的安全、质量和疗效至关重要。本范围审查的目的是确定药店和药店内最常见的GSP合规问题。遵循PRISMA范围审查扩展指南,检索PubMed和Google Scholar,以确定2016年1月至2022年2月的相关主要文献。所有英文研究设计都有资格纳入,只要它们报告了完成个别普惠制活动的定量数据。对搜索结果进行了重复的独立筛选。对最终纳入的研究进行了质量评估。数据提取由一名审查人员进行,并计算观察到的总依从性百分比(%依从性)以及根GSP操作的95%置信区间。在已确定的380份记录中,包括15篇文章。这些研究在10个国家进行,大多数是参与性研究。消防安全的总合规率最低(0.9%)。受控物质、气候、光线、通风和温度以及库存和记账操作的总合合规率均低于50%。尽管有证据表明存在基本的控制和措施,但我们发现许多GSP业务的合规性很低。为了确保药品的完整性,重要的是加强安全措施的执行力度,将资源投资于人员培训,考虑非正式的供应商做法,并促进公开分享外部和理事机构对储存做法的检查和审查的全球数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信